Artefact/Reflective Case Study

 

Black Magic,

Now you see it now you don’t. 

Kieran Woodhouse

P4085770

 Module Name: Fine Art Dissertation, Artefact/Reflective Case Study.

BA (Hons) Fine Art. Level 6.

Module Code:  FAE3013-N-BFI-2016

Module Leader: Aikaterini Gegisian

Module Tutors: Jared Pappas-Kelly

Deadline: 18th January 2017

Word count:  6,863 words [Including quotes, headings and image labels. Excluding Contents page, bibliography, Table of illustrations and Appendixes]

picture1

My Cityscape Artwork

Objects, either diverse or homogenous, are arranged in such a manner that shadows cast on a wall, under proper lighting, have little to do with the image of the initial installation. From this duality lies the magic of his works. [1]

Rashad Alakbarov

Contents Page

Introduction                                 Page 4

Chapter 1:                                     Pages 5 & 6

Chapter 2:                                    Pages 7 & 8

Chapter 3:                                    Page 8

Chapter 4:                                    Pages 9 & 10

Chapter 5:                                    Pages 10, 11, 12 & 13

Chapter 6:                                    Pages 13, 14 & 15

Chapter 7:                                    Pages 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19

Chapter 8:                                    Page 20

Conclusion                                  Page 20, 21 & 22

Bibliography                               Pages 23, 24, 25, 26 & 27

Table of illustrations               Pages 28, 29 & 30

Appendix A                                 Page 31

Appendix B                                 Page 32, 33, 34 & 35

 

Black Magic, now you see me now you don’t.

Introduction

From the dawn of time shadows have been produced by the sun the moon and then by the fire that early mankind used to ward of danger, light their caves and generate warmth. Animals have evolved to adapt to different levels of darkness, because the world is full of shadows. One hides in the shadows as not to be seen. The information that is conveyed in a shadow is fundamental to the aid of seeing, as it gives extra information to our brains, to fill in the dots as it were when trying to decipher what we may be looking at.  The underbelly of animals have evolved to be lighter than their backs for the reason that most natural light comes from above, and the paler belly counteracts the inevitable shadow, so the animal scarcely stands out and so is harder to see by the predator. Evolution has identified that the eyes of the predator would be primarily hunting from the shadows so has designed them to see shadows and contrasts when darkness falls. The fact that shadows are needed by most living thing to make sense of the world, to see depth, form, dark, light, wet and dry which are especially important within the visual arts intrigues me, and compels me to use them in my artworks.

My artwork this year is a progression from the pieces I was producing last year, which related to the theme of architecture and shadows. I felt I wished to widen the subject matter and push the shadow theme more into the forefront of my artworks, as the intransient appeal of shadows interested me. The fact that shadows are not permanent, only fleeting and controlled by time, and are only present as long as a light source is available, for example the trajectory of the sun as it passes from east to west each day.  I wished to try and control them and so produce interesting and unusual pieces, by taming the medium of shade and light in an artificial way. Roberto Casati says; ‘Our vision is so bewitched by chiaroscuro that if we were to find ourselves suddenly in a shadow less world, everything would seem insubstantial and without depth’. [2] What he means by this is that our eyes are programmed to see the contrasts between light and shade within artworks, and the world around us, and life without shade would make everything appear flat, not three Dimensional.

 

Chapter 1: How artists have used shadows through the ages

Artists have used shadows through the ages in paintings, animation, shadow theatre, and sculptures, to name a few. The word shadow as used by artists is divided into three degrees, – Shadow, Half Shadow and Cast Shadow. Shadow, is the darkness that the object’s body creates upon itself, at the far end of the spectrum of shading. Half Shadow, is the area between light and shadow that gradually passes from one to the other, diminishing little by little according to the shape of the object. The Cast shadow is the shadow that is created on the ground by the portrayed object within the painting.

picture2

‘A man seated at a Table in a Lofty Room’ 1606 – 1669

While the Shadow and the Half Shadow must be present within a composition to create depth and give three dimensional structure to the artwork, the Cast Shadow has been in and out of fashion with artists throughout the ages. Yet it is the Cast Shadow that brings atmosphere and creates a mood to the composition that cannot be achieved without its use. In Leonardo Da Vinci’s time artists largely avoided using the Cast Shadow as they felt it spoilt their works and distracted from the composition they were trying to create. Da Vinci himself wrote on the subject and from his notes it could not be clearer his feelings on the subject. He thought it was easier to veil the sun, and create a slightly misty feel within the composition rather than to try and paint harsh cast shadows in a composition which portrayed an illuminated sunny scene.

A quote from Da Vinci’s notes stated; ‘Light too conspicuously cut off by shadows is exceedingly disapproved of by painters. Hence, to avoid such awkwardness when you depict bodies in open county, do not make your figures appear illuminated by the sun, but contrive a certain amount of mist or of transparent cloud to be placed between the object and the sun and thus – since the object is not harshly illuminated by the sun – the outlines of the shadows will not clash with outlines of the lights.’ [3] This shows the prejudice and reluctance at that time for painters to include Cast Shadows within their works. Although Da Vinci was an expert of chiaroscuro effects and had studied the effect of various shadows meticulously, he did not use Cast Shadows in his own paintings. This was not the case with earlier generations of painters in the first decades of the fifteenth century both north and south of the Alps. Also after Da Vinci’s era the Early Renaissance painters such as Masaccio and Campin, in their endeavours to create visual reality within their works, faithfully rendered cast shadows. As did early seventeenth century painters in particular Caravaggio and Rembrandt were again interested in using the shadow. Before the end of the nineteenth century the impressionists had taken to using a variety of light effects in the open air, and a fresh interest in colour and shadows was eagerly studied. But not all cultures were using shadows. The Japanese chose to leave them out of their works in the interest of a decorative composition and were still doing so at the close of the nineteenth century. So too Gauguin who agreed with the Japanese, and felt that shadows could be left out of the composition as they served no purpose. He was influenced by photography, stating that it was the only legitimate art in which to use them. Gauguin stated; ‘the Japanese, who could do so well without light and shade,’ he was, he said ‘inclined to ‘do away’ with shadows which serve illusionism’[4]

The shadow was really reinstated when cubism appeared on the scene. It used shadows in order to both guide and confuse the viewer. Later still Surrealism exploited the effect of shadows to enhance the mood and mystery the Surrealists sought to create in their dream like visions of an alternative reality. In De Chirico’s ‘The Enigma of a Day 1914 his dreamlike deserted vision of city square, and the harsh shadows cast by the statue and solitary figures in the far background, adds a feeling of worry or unease to the scene.

picture3

The Enigma of a Day, 1914 Artist -De Chirico

Chapter 2: Shadow play puppets and theatricality

picture1

Chinese traditional puppet theatre

Chinese shadow play is said to date back around 2000 years or even earlier. It depicts stories containing romance, heroic adventure, fantasy and humour. All shadow puppets figures are controlled by three wires fastened to rods, a main supporting control and the two others that control the arms and hands, with the legs swinging freely. The main supporting rod being attached at a right angle to the head, so it is not visible on the screen. The origins of shadow theatre are not know but most academics agree it originated in the east where these ancient traditions still survive today. It is associated with religious ceremonies and held in the highest respect, more so than anywhere else around the world today. All the artists that follow in this essay were chosen because they link directly to ancient shadow puppetry theatres, as does my artefact because it tells a story to. The difference being my composition does not move, so to create movement I have used paint and silhouettes in action style stances. Mine were created with a scalpel and card, the same techniques and materials used in shadow theatre, this linking it directly with my artefact.

picture1

Attraction perform shadow theatre 2013

Today’s Shadow theatre performances use dancers, actors, and large theatre screens to increase the emotional effect on audiences. For example Britain’s Got Talent, a popular talent show that invites performers to enter the competition, and if selected they compete against the other contestants and are eliminated one by one until there is a final winner. In 2013 it featured a shadow theatre company called ‘Attraction’ who used ballet, and current emotionally charged music, to create a story of a couple meeting in London and falling in love, and having a child. The husband is sent off to war to his death, with the penultimate scene that of the young child laying flowers on her father’s grave holding the hand of her mother. The audience was visibly moved by the performance. With modern technology, great dramatic large screen backings, modern lighting and computer software, stunning performances can be created unlike years ago when the puppeteers only had a candle for light, silk screen and rigid inflexible puppets.

Chapter 3: Silhouettes  

Silhouettes which unlike shadows are real and immoveable objects, are the earliest forms of arts history. From cave drawings portraying the world around them, to the silhouettes of Kara Walker whose work I will talk about further, nothing much has changed, other than the materials used and the detail that can be created today from modern inventions and tools. The appeal of this form of artwork is that you don’t have to be a great or talented artist to produce a simple and amazing piece of art, the materials are readily available and not hard to acquire, from ochre clay used to produce cave drawings to the simple black card used to produce silhouettes.

The silhouettes first became popular as artworks in the 18th Century as a cheaper alternative to miniature oil paintings. The name silhouette takes its name from the Marquis Etienne de silhouette (1709 – 1767) who was the controller general in France in 1759. Because of his severe measures to deal with the French economy anything that was mean or cheap was referred to as a la silhouette. At this time black cut-out portraits became very popular especially with the Marquis and the term was incorporated into the French vocabulary and was later adopted worldwide. The image left shows the process where a shadow falls on transparent paper which is then traced from the other side. The accuracy of the outline created by this technique gave rise to a theory that the character and personality of a person could be worked out just from the shape of their profile. This was called ‘physiognomics’.

picture1

Chapter 4: What does shadow/silhouette art mean for contemporary art

picture1

Peter Callesen creating Transparent God 2009

picture1

Youngman’ 2012. Noble & Webster

Shadow art in the contemporary world of art is often overlooked by many artists as being too simple and basic. This is the beauty of shadow art, because in the modern world those who practise ideas within the field are engaged in the simplicities of art. Developing a deeper understanding of the concepts that are used in shadow art to manipulate the shadows to appeal to a wider audience. Since the methods used are so simple yet executed so well, helps to convey a deeper message to the audience than what they see and conceive within in their own mind. Take Peter Callesen works for example he uses specific tools, such as a scalpel too create artwork out of simple A4 white paper which appeals too all and is readily available.  My Artefacts shadow/silhouette work promotes movement in the brush strokes I have used and how the balloon looks like it is taking off. In the contemporary world of art which is hectic, this depicted movement in the artefact relates to how everybody wants to make things which are meaningful and relate to everybody. However in a rush to make this process and with differences in money and reputation some people get left behind in this race to be noticed in contemporary art, just like the person who is trying to catch the hot air balloon in my artefact work. Also shadow art helps root contemporary art, as the art form uses mainly Black and White as opposed to the heavy use of colour in today’s art world. We need shadow art in contemporary art as it helps add depth to many artworks for example, we need shadows within compositions too cause tension and add drama to the work. Just like the person in my artefact who is holding onto dear life onto the frame nearly plummeting into the city scape.

It’s a good skill and method too use to ground contemporary art and deliver simple yet meaningful messages. As the use of light and fire are natural elements born from the beginning of time, these elements always produce shadows, and I am trying to mix the old forms of shadow art with the newer forms of shadow art making it a very contemporary but simple, as the mediums and tools needed to produce my artwork is minimal.

My artwork In relation to the contemporary audience hopefully will be intrigued, due to the appearance of it being a common framed painting, but on closer inspection the audience will see the multiple 2d and 3d effects I have used to present shadows and silhouettes in a contemporary way.

Chapter 5: Contemporary Silhouette Art that tells a story

All the artists I will be exploring in this chapter use Silhouette Art, to create different stories that are emotionally poles apart. Kara Walker uses silhouette imagery that address serious issues, displayed on a white wall to create contrast. This is accepted and recognised by the viewer as carrying deep messages that make a point about human existence, and oppression and inhuman treatment of black slaves in the past. The other artists Lotte Reiniger and Jan Pienkowski use silhouette art to create stories for children, which carry light hearted messages of happiness and fantasy for entertainment. Opposite to Kara Walkers which carry a darker message of the destruction of black people and the portrayal of their chaotic lives. Though my framed artwork is nowhere near the horrors that Kara Walker portrays, it still carries a similar theme of destruction and chaos which is the essence of what my work is about, which links with Walkers work. Reiniger and Pienkowski link with Walker as they instil emotions within the viewer, just happier emotions, whether watching Reiniger’s films or Peinkowski’s books. Which ties all our artworks together that of creating different emotional responses within the viewer’s imagination.

Kara Walker was born in California in 1969. Through her silhouetted figures she explores themes of race, gender and sexuality deliberately creating feelings of shock and disgust in the viewer, and there is a theme of emotional seriousness to the stories or imagery she places her silhouettes in, thus creating an emotional feeling of shock and disgust for the viewer. Walkers themes explore the raw intersection of race, gender, and sexuality through her iconic, silhouetted figures. Walker’s silhouetted figures are serious and yet funny in style depicting her views of how black people were treated as slaves by their owners. When asked by Matthea Harvey the Guardian reporter, where the impulse to make the cut-out murals came from originally? Walker said; I think it goes back to when I first got to graduate school. I was 22. I was writing to find my voice, because I didn’t talk very much. This kind of Marquis de Sade stuff started coming out of me, which I didn’t know was there. I was writing on a typewriter in an open studio. A friend later called those my Unabomber writings. It was a release that was very real, disruptive and secretive. I think the cut paper has that same quality. [5] What Walker means by this is that she started writing in the style of Marquis de Sade who was famous for writing about sexual fantasies, violence, and unrestrained by morality erotic works. Also the Unabomber reference relates to a famous man called Theodore John “Ted” Kaczynski who was and American anarchist and domestic terrorist. Her friend by saying this was expressing Walkers written works had an anarchist style meaning they were rebellious and could cause trouble and discourse if allowed to be put on public display. Kaczynski was also against any new technology, so Walkers works relates to Kaczynski’s ideas around this theme, as cut paper silhouettes are an old style way of producing art, as to a typewriter is now outdated.

Kara is experimenting with the audience’s views of racism and how far she can take the contrast of a serious subject in a playful way. In essence Kara’s message is it’s not how you look or how you behave, but how you treat people is what matters. Kara’s work has two meanings and draws on her own history and the power struggle black people have experienced. Through removing a silhouette from the paper she is bringing their stories to life.

picture1

‘Grub for Sharks: A Concession to the Negro Populace’2004

Her cut outs relate to old historical events and express artistically her feelings on these themes. Through the use of dark silhouetted figures she shows how  black people have been persecuted, and treated as a commodity as opposed to human beings, through artwork depicting slavery, for example the work ‘Grub for sharks: A Concession to the Negro Populace’ 2004. It depicts the practice of throwing slaves over board to their deaths when the cargo needed to be lightened, for example when a storm was threatening to sink the slave ship. The silhouettes Walker portrays on the walls of the gallery are used to shock and stir emotions from deep within the viewer of sadness, sympathy and horror. The shadows are sometimes disfigured and distorted accentuating the theme of tortured souls.

Hilton Als, journalist for the New Yorker Magazine said; ‘In 2000, Walker gave a talk at the Des Moines Art Center. Afterward, a white man in the audience asked her how long she intended to make the type of work she did. Walker responded, “Oh, probably as long as I’m black and a woman.” [6] Hilton Als says; (This exchange has been quoted as an example of Walker’s “fearlessness,” with Walker depicted in the press as the art community’s very own Sojourner Truth, a paragon of black righteousness in a corrupt white world—an image that Walker, who has said that she occasionally feels like “somebody’s pet project,” which she is very much aware of. [7])  By this she means she will not be controlled by what people say or think about her work, or have her work characterised by other people in pursuit of their own gender and race agendas. (Sojourner Truth, was a female African-American slave and abolitionist and women’s right activist who escaped slavery)

                              picture1picture1

The fairy tale films andnThe adventures of Prince Achmed

A further artist whose work I have studied which links with the work of Kara Walker’s silhouette theme, is Lotte Reiniger. She was born in Berlin in 1899, a prominent silhouette animator according to Philip Kemp, no one else has used her specific animation technique, making it utterly their own ‘To this date she has no rivals and for all practical purposes the history of silhouette animation begins and ends with Reiniger’ [8] Altogether Reiniger made nearly sixty films, of which forty survive. Firstly she was attracted to longer fairy tale films, but in later years made short animation pieces. Reiniger was self-taught and from an early age had an ability to cut free handed paper silhouettes, which she used in her own home made shadow theatre. Her first job was for the film director Paul Wegner for whom she made silhouettes that were shown in the intervals of his films. She then joined the experimental animation studio Berliner Institut fur Kulturforschung. But when the Nazis seized power Reiniger left Germany with Carl Koch a member of the animation studio and travelled to England in December 1935. Reiniger said; because I didn’t like this whole Hitler thing and because I had many Jewish friends whom I now was no longer allowed to call friends’. [9] In England Reiginer went on to make many more films until her death in 1981

picture1

Illustration from Pages 2 & 3 from the book A Thousand Nights and One Night, 2007

Another artists who also links with my artefact theme is Jan Pienkowski, famous for his illustrations in children’s literature. He uses paper cut illustrations in the form of silhouettes which have close similarities to the ancient shadow puppetry theatres of the past, as do all the above mentioned artists, which also links strongly to the artefact that I have produced, inspired by the artists I have chosen to research. In an interview with the Book Trust an online resource to promote reading in children Pienkowski said; “I got this tremor in my right hand and couldn’t draw a straight line,” he explains; “So I would say that it didn’t occur to me to use cut-outs until The Thousand Nights and One Night, and that was because of the tremor.” [10] This explains why he started working with the medium of cut out silhouettes, Pienkowski would still draw the images, and then pass them on to colleague with a steadier hand, to cut them out with a scalpel.

In the next two chapters I will be exploring the work of modern conceptual artists who use recycled objects in diverse and imaginative ways to produce amazing paper and shadow artworks through hours of pain stacking patience and creativity.

Chapter 6: 3 Dimensional Paper Art

Carrying on from previous chapters but adding another dimension, Peter Callesen artworks start as silhouettes initially, and then turns into 3 Dimensional artworks, which is inspirational and one wonders how this is achievable. His theme is bringing the silhouette to life by creating depth, and space, he also leaves a lot of negative space behind in this process, which holds just as much value artistically as the finished 3 Dimensional artworks.

Peter Callesen is a Danish artist who creates seemingly impossible sculptures from something as fragile and mundane as A4 sized white paper. Callesen takes an unambiguous sheet of white paper and transforms it to a state of metamorphosis, into a delicate fragile sculptures that seems to be alive. He carefully considers the contrasts between positive and negative space. He possesses an ability to understand intricate shape analysis and how to join silhouettes cut outs to great effect, to make a bigger and better sculpture from the jigsaw of shapes he has chosen to cut out. Although he sometimes trims the paper he removes, he never adds to the silhouettes he cuts out. Callesen uses very simple tools like scalpels and he has adapted tools himself to create certain effects for example stretching and curving the paper. For very delicate work he uses dentistry tools in order to glue and work the paper to the desired effect. Having a basic training in architecture has helped him when creating his architectural masterpieces. A quote by Callesen taken from an architects website Callesen says; “By taking away all the information and starting from scratch using the blank white A4 paper sheet for my creations, I feel I have found a material that we are all able to relate to, and at the same time the A4 paper sheet is neutral and open to fill with different meaning. The thin white paper gives the paper sculptures a frailty that underlines the tragic and romantic theme of my works.” [11] This statement explains in some way why he prefers to work with the medium of paper.

His first big break was in 2003 when he was asked to participate in the Amorph festival of performative arts in Helsinki, for which he made a floating Styrofoam castle for the show, and a smaller paper template cut out castle for the show’s catalogue, which had to be cut out and put together by the reader. Since then he has become best known for his paper sculptures, and not his early work in painting, video and performance arts.

picture1

’Distant Wish’, 2006 Peter Callesen

The image ‘Distant Wish’ 2006 of a bird and a flower looks natural, as when the bird approaches the flower it becomes a moment frozen in time. It is clever how he uses shapes that take time and effort to create a realistic look. As with my balloon composition and Cityscape Artefact Callesens work uses similar techniques as it is part 2d and part 3d giving a natural real life effect, and also keeping the audience guessing. Since they need to take several looks at the work to determine how he has created this 2d/3d effect and what message is he trying to communicate, which is what I am trying to achieve. Callesen heavily relies on contrast in his work as I do. This provokes thought in the audience and is similar to my work which uses shadows, silhouettes and recycled rubbish to show the difference between the initial material and how light and dark can produce another artwork separate from the first, as his cut outs are being artworks in themselves, as well as the sculptures he produces. Two for the price of one as it were. This is similar to my recycled items, the rubbish being one artwork, and this making a second shadow artwork to stand on its own.

Chapter 7: Contemporary Shadow Art created from recycled items

In this Chapter the theme will be contemporary artworks made from recycled items, rubbish and collected items, that create stunning pieces of Shadow Art. How a pile of rubbish can be transformed into a recognisable image by the flick of a switch.

Tim Noble was born in Gloustershire in 1966 and Sue Webster was born in Leicester in 1967. They met at Nottingham Polytechnic in 1986. They have been making art together for two decades, putting themselves into their work over the years by working collaboratively. Much of their work is concerned with the body, love and being close to each other. In the book ‘Nihilistic Optimistic’ Noble states; “When we’re in the studio we need to get out, cos we’re in the dark and you end up going for a little walk, down the alley way, trying to avoid people, and there would be one solitary chair that someone has put out, but very meaningful, almost like it’s sitting there, sadly, on its own.” Webster continues “it’s almost like a gift as if someone had actually presented it to us. Sometimes I’ll go for a walk and bring something back, and Tim’ll go, ‘I was looking at that yesterday’. All the stuff in the new show is from the streets around here-unwanted things that have been thrown out.” [12]  Noble and Webster by using common recyclable material they collect from the streets, produce shadow art that is realistic and recognisable when a light is projected upon it. Their shadow art moves in a fluid way and it doesn’t have a set form as extra towers of rubbish can be added to create the same shadow of a man but with the limbs and body stance altered slightly. It can be moved to different positions, as shown in the image ‘Youngman’ 2012 in chapter 4. As the final shadow is created by individual towers of rubbish, that when lined up correctly create the completed image. When interviewed by Hans Ulrich Obrist about when did the shadow pieces enter their works, in the book Nihilistic Optimistic, Sue Webster said; “So we were working on making sculptures with electricity and light bulbs, but we had to make them in the dark…” Webster stating; “Yeah, we used to leave the light sculpture on because we had no money for heating, and they would warm up the studio. We used to fiddle the electricity meter so we had these light bulbs running around the clock. I think I walked into the studio one day and the silhouette of my profile was on the wall, and it was so precise that Tim wanted to draw round it.” [13] Webster is explaining how by chance the idea of creating shadow art originated from.

picture1

‘The Game Keeper’s Gibbet’ 2011. Noble & Webster.

The shadow artwork ‘The Game keeper’s Giblet’ 2011, is made from recycled animal material comprised of frog’s, squirrels, a mouse, a rat and bird parts including birds feet. The creatures are bound together with a coiled rope and then gilded with pure gold. An interview conducted by Louisa Elderton in the book Turning the Seventh Corner, Sue Webster explains who the idea for mummification of animals came about, for the artwork ‘The Game Keeper’s Giblet’ 2011. Webster said; “…being and artist you collect things and you don’t know why; all you know is that one day they will come in useful for something. Tim’s mum lives in the countryside and she had just bought two kittens. I remember going to visit her two or three years ago and while I was sitting watching the telly I moved the sofa back and I found a ball of fluff. I picked it up and blew on it only to reveal a dried frog. And then I found something behind the television, and asked if this happens all the time and she said, “Yeah it happens every day.” [14] Sue Webster goes onto explain in the same interview that she gave Tim’s mum a box with dead things written on, and asked her to keep everything the cats killed, and keep it for her to collect every three months. After that mummification of animals has been a fascination for Noble and Webster, becoming interwoven with their artistic practice.  When the viewer realises that dead animals are used to create the shadow it can cause emotions of shock, disgust, sadness. The work creates a contrast of humanity, one made from death. It is 3d and is stacked on a spike which has negative connotations for example, criminal’s heads in the past were displayed this way to scare the public and keep order.

For my artwork I have used other materials that are not living, polystyrene, black card, wood, plastic, and paint. These materials are inanimate objects, and the way I have arranged them creates emotion through the shadow alone. My Hot air balloon piece also shows the theme of death, similar to Noble & Webster’s as the silhouette figures are plummeting to their death. It is within a frame, so the composition is detached and separate from the shadow cityscape below, but is still part of it, so the whole composition is still joined which adds depth to the artwork as a whole.

picture1

Looking At One City from Two Viewpoints. 2001. Rashad Alakbarov

Another artist who uses recycled material to make artwork is Rashad Alakbarov his cityscapes and other shadow artworks, inspired me to create my cityscape artefact.

Alakbarov collects mundane items and cleverly uses them to create shadows which have everyday meanings. The artwork is raised higher than the light which makes the Cityscape shadows larger and more impressive when thrown onto the gallery walls. Alakbarov also uses recycled rubbish hung from wires like a mobile, it moves and is fluid. Only when the wires are still and bottles or plastic coloured Perspex fall in line, does a recognisable shadow form on the wall.

picture1

Portrait made of Bottles 2011. Rashad Alakabarov

Other artist that use similar methods are Diet Wiegman and Kumi Yamashita, whose artworks I have studied in detail.

Yamashita uses sideways light which shows a womans profile made from wooden number blocks. The setting for ‘City View’ 2003 was in a business centre and it adds to the business-like theme.  My artefact links with all the artists in this chapter as they do with each other, as we all use the same techniques and similar materials to create a shadow artwork.

picture1

City View (close up), 2003. Kumi Yamashita

‘City View’ 2003 creates the feeling of a picture that isn’t completed, however when looking at the larger picture, it can be seen as a whole and makes sense. The separation of the objects promotes the audience’s creative side allowing it to look at different parts of the artwork individually which communicates different messages. Similarly my Hot Air Balloon composition within a separated frame, and cityscape below is a theatrical spectacle with a lot going on. By looking at all the different parts of the artwork, the viewer also can interpret different meanings.

Kumi Yamashita was interviewed by Andy Butler who works for Designboom an online source for artists. Butler asked; “You seem to work mostly with light and the manipulation of it to form shadows what attracted you to this way of working?” Yamishita said; “Mainly because I love looking at light and shadow. I remember sitting on the patio of my family home in the late autumn afternoon. The sun was setting and was casting the shadow of swaying branches of our fragrant olive tree on the ground. The colour of the light was gradually changing from warm orange to cool blue as the shadow of the tree stretched and faded away. In my young mind I questioned the permanence and ephemera of all living things as the tree stood soundly in front of me in the almost monochromatic landscape. For me, shadows came to symbolize another dimension of life, perhaps something even more real than its holder.” [15] What Yamashita means by this is that for one moment in time for her, shadows became more important to her than the life that casts the shadow, as sort of epiphany a sudden great realization how shadows can be used, enjoyed and exist even though it may be for a short time as they do not last forever.

picture1

Shadow Dancing 2008. Diet Wiegman

Finally Diet Wiegman who has been making beautiful shadow sculptures out of trash, scrap metal and other objects for almost 50 year. He uses techniques along the lines of  Noble and Webster but with a twist, literally. Wiegman’s artwork ‘Shadow Dancing’ 2008, is created from junk that is placed on a rotating pedestal, As the sculpture turns it sways and morphs into the iconic pose of the late Michael Jackson, only to disappear again once the trash is no longer in alignment.

Wiegman relates to my work as he uses distance, and light and recycled rubbish as I do, Creating shadow artworks that only look recognisable when the lights are switched on, and the shadow is formed, the original discarded rubbish materials looking nothing like the shadow they produce.

 Chapter about 8: How the research links with the Artefact

I decided to start my research right from the beginning of time as shadows have always been present in our world, which is clear from the introduction I wrote at the beginning. Then I traced the shadow and its other half as it were the silhouettes from their earliest forms and uses in art, right through to their contemporary possibilities in art for them both today.

I purposely chose to research artists that worked with these two mediums, both old and contemporary artists, but making sure that the older artists were still current and relevant into today’s society and culture.

All the research I have done to date relates to my artefact which includes both shadows and silhouettes, it encompasses both old shadow puppet art, and more contemporary styles of art which use recycled rubbish, to create interesting, diverse and surprising artworks, similar in theme to the artworks of the artists mentioned in chapters 5, 6 and 7.

Conclusion

In summary, I was attracted to working with shadows as an art form last year, when I created sculptures that incorporated shadows as a by-product of the sculptures I created. I incorporated lights within and around them, in order to create atmosphere and give my work the wow factor and generate interest within the viewer. The fact that shadows are not real, can be changed, only exist if light is present and an object there to block the lights path, interests me. As does the fleetingness of the shadow. This year through experimenting with many different techniques such as: Light work, cutting, positioning, and movement, I created a 2D and 3D composition using both silhouettes and shadows, from black card and discarded materials I have picked up in skips. Having been able to manipulate my ideas in relation to shadows and access the darker emotions of death, destruction, uncertainty and chaos which are not commonly exposed within regular artwork. This linking with Kara Walkers themes, that relate to slavery and Noble and Webster’s themes of death and mummification. Adding a second dimension to my artwork which links my work with Peter Callesen. Rashad Alakbarov, Diet Wiegman, Kumi Yamashita, Tim Noble and Sue Webster, who also use recycled rubbish to make 3D sculptures, that go onto create the shadow compositions.

The Artists and art forms I have explored within my Reflective study, produce shadow based work, experimenting with darkness which naturally triggers emotions, which can be uninviting. For example if you open a door into a house with no lights on it triggers the feelings of uncertainty and insecurity of the unknown. When Tim noble and Sue Webster exhibit their work in dark rooms with only one light, this triggers similar emotional responses within the viewer. In relation to my work, I am trying to trigger similar feeling and emotions within the viewer that shadows do.

My city scape produces darkness below a multi-dimensional layered artefact, the figures who are falling from the balloon into the darkness, produces emotions of destruction and chaos within the viewer. The aggressive brush work surrounding the balloon adds to the lack of control. The inevitability of the silhouettes situation, one of plummeting to their death, transfers this message of sudden death and dark narrative to the viewer. Similar themes to my research from early shadow theatre narratives right through to the modern contemporary shadow artists I have researched. Shadow artists can play within the realms of darkness and their experimentation allows them to access emotions which are not often accessed within other art forms. Due to shadow art being a small sector of contemporary art, the beauty of shadow art is its simplicity as are the methods used to create it, each shadow art has a unique path of creation, this uniqueness, can relate to the viewer and create emotional response of surprise and amazement, as to what can be created from unambiguous simple materials, which isn’t often triggered with regular artworks. For example, through creating a cityscape shadow rather than simply painting a cityscape, one creates a second piece of artwork, the Silhouette composition above the city brings out a different dimension of the city, which will trigger a different negative set of emotions

I have taken in a lot of information and ideas from various sources and developed it into a piece of artwork that incorporates my own ideas techniques and themes, that relate to the artists I have chosen to research. I have enjoyed the process of research as it has helped focus my ideas and brought clarity to exactly why I have used certain methods within my work. The fact that my work is multi-dimensional and has used different methods, shows that I have understood and transferred the knowledge I have gained through my research to inspire me in the creation of my artefact.

I have enjoyed experimenting with different methods of shadow creation and this in essence has led to the creation of my piece.

My Artefact is located in the Waterhouse building, in the back room, on the back wall.

Picture1.pngpicture1

My Cityscape Artefact

Bibliography

Primary Sources [eg. Exhibitions, contact artist directly, interviews]

Exhibitions visited

Paris

Musee D’Orsay, Paris. Le Douanier Rousseau L’innocence Archaique exhibition from 22nd March to 17th July. [Visited 4/5/16] [Proof see exhibition brochure and receipts]

Au Musee Du Louvre, Saison XVIIIE, Hubert Robert Exhibition, A L’Ombre Des Frondaisons D’Arcueil Exhibition and also Un Musse Revolutionnaire Exhibition. [Visited 2/5/16] [Proof see exhibition brochure and receipts]

L’Espace Dali, Salvador Dali Sculptures and Graphic Artworks museum, 11 rue Poulbot, Paris 18. [Visited May 2016] [Proof see Exhibition brochure]

London

Tate Modern, Boiler House Exhibitions, Art From 1900 to Now’ and the Switch House Exhibitions ‘Art From 1960 to Now’ [Visited 7/8/16] [Proof see exhibition brochure and receipts]

Victoria and Albert Museum, Undressed Exhibition’ [visited 8/8/16] [Proof see exhibition brochure and receipts]

Jerwood Solo Presentation. Artworks by Lucy Parker, Rachael Pimm and Katie Schwab. 27th July – 28th August 2016. [Visited 10/8/16] [Proof see Exhibition brochure]

Newcastle

The Laing Gallery Alice in Wonderland Exhibition. From 14 May – 2 October 2016. The Laing Gallery, Newcastle, England. [Visited 21st July 2016] [Proof Exhibition brochure and receipts]

Baltic, Exhibition:-Ground Floor, Christiana Soulou, 25th June – 25th September 2016

Baltic, Exhibition:-Level 2, Jumana Emil Abboud, 6th May – 2nd October 2016

Baltic, Exhibition:-Level 3, Caroline Achaintre, 15th July – 30th October 2016

Baltic, Exhibition:-Level 4, The Playground Project, 15th July – 30th October 2016 [Visited all 4 on 20/7/16] [Proof see exhibition brochure and receipts]

Middlesbrough

Teesside University Fine Art Degree Show, ADORNITY. [Visited May 2016]

Teesside University MA fine Art Show, Delicious Edge. [Visited September 2016]

Mima, Jane and Louise Wilson, Undead sun: We put the World Before You’. 1st October 2016 – 15th January 2017.

Mima Winifred Nicholson, ‘Liberation of Colour’ 22nd October 2016 – 12th February 2017.

Blah Blah various exhibitions

York

York Art Gallery, York, England. [Visited 7/6/16]

Yorkshire Museum, York, England. [Visited 7/6/16]

York Castle Museum, York, London. [Visited 26/8/16]

Secondary Sources [eg. Books, Websites, Journals, Films.]

Books

Books: Introduction

Casati, Roberto. Translated from the Italian by Abigail Asher, Shadows, Unlocking Their Secrets, from Plato to Our Time. Published by Vintage Books, Random House Inc. New York. 2004. [Page 7]

Books: Chapter 1

Gombrich, Ernst. Shadows The Depiction of Cast Shadow In Western Art. Published by the National Gallery Publications Limited.1995. Published to accompany an exhibition in the Sunley Room at the National Gallery, London 26 April-18 June 1995. [Page 6, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26]

Books: Chapter 2

Currell, David. Shadow Puppets and Shadow Play. Published by The Crowood Press Ltd, Wiltshire, England. 2007. [Pages 17, 23, 24]

Books: Chapter 3

Currell, David. Shadow Puppets and Shadow Play. Published by The Crowood Press Ltd, Wiltshire, England. 2007. [Page 12]

Gombrich, Ernst. Shadows The Depiction of Cast Shadow In Western Art. Published by the National Gallery Publications Limited.1995. [Page 31]

Books: Chapter 4. None

Books: Chapter 5

Kara Walker.

Gale, Matthew edited. The Tate Modern the Handbook. Published by Tate Publishing. London. 2016. [Page 315]

Jan Pienkowski.

Walser, David. The Thousand Nights and One Night. Published by Pengin Group. London 2007. [Pages 2 & 3]

Books: Chapter 6

Manco, Tristan. Raw + Material = Art, found, scavenged and upcycled. Published by Thames & Hudson Ltd. London. 2012. [Pages 52 – 55]

Books: Chapter 7

Tim Noble and Sue Webster

Yablonsky, Linda. Noble & Webster. Athens: DESTE Foundation for Contemporary Art, 2014. [Page 129]

Noble, Tim. Webster, Sue. ‘Nihilistic Optimistic, Tim Noble & Sue Webster. Published by Blain|Southern. 2012. [Pages 17 & 99]

Noble, Tim. Webster Sue. ‘Turning the Seventh Corner’ Published by Blain|Southern. 2011. Published on the occasion of the Exhibition Turning the Seventh Corner. 30th April – 16th July 2011. [Pages 13 & 33]

Books: Chapter 8. None

Books: Conclusion. None

Articles and other printed material e.g. Journals etc.

 

Film and videos:

Lotte Reigner

Reigner, Lotte. Lotte Reigner, The Fairy Tale Films, PG, BFI DVD.

Reigner, Lotte. The Adventures of Prince Achmed, PG, BFI DVD.

Additional material e.g. websites etc.

Websites

 ‘Kara Walker @ Crocker Art Museum’ 2013. http://www.squarecylinder.com/2013/12/kara-walker-crocker-art-museum/ [Accessed 06/10/16 at 2:33 pm]

http://www.art21.org/artists/kara-walker [Accessed 06/10/16 at 2.39 pm]

Alakbarov, Rashad  http://rashadalakbarov.com/en/biography/ [Accessed 14/10/2016 at 12:52pm]

http://www.petercallesen.com/paper/a4-papercuts / [Accessed 28/10/16 at 11:39 am]

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/10/08/the-shadow-act [Accessed 7/11/16 at 8.17 pm]

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/10/08/the-shadow-act [Accessed 7/11/16 at 8.21 pm]

http://weirdfictionreview.com/2012/07/tim-noble-and-sue-webster-give-a-few-extra-turns-of-the-screw/ [Accessed 11/11/16 at 2.20 pm]

http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/21/4130960/the-incredible-shadow-dancing-light-sculptures-of-diet-wiegman [Accessed 21/11/16 at 9.31pm]

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2015/sep/27/kara-walker-interview-victoria-miro-gallery-atlanta [Accessed 11/1/17 1.49 pm]

http://www.designboom.com/art/kumi-yamashita-interview-03-05-2015 [Accessed 13/1/17 9.53 am]

http://www.arch2o.com/paper-cut-sculptures-peter-callesen/   [Accessed 13/01/17 3.30 pm]

http://www.booktrust.org.uk/books/children/illustrators/interviews/111  [Accessed 13/01/17 3.22 pm]

 

Online videos

Attraction perform their stunning shadow act – Week 1 Auditions | Britain’s Got Talent 2013https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4Fv98jttYA [Accessed 15/11/16 at 7.11pm]

‘Shadow Dancer’ Diet Wiegman. http://dietwiegman.tumblr.com/Videos [Accessed 21/11/16 at 9.11pm]

Table of illustrations

Front cover image:

My Cityscape Artefact

Image 1:

Artist: a follower of Rembrandt or his school, 1606 – 1669. ‘ A man seated at a Table in a Lofty Room’. Date made: 1628-30, Oil and oak, 55.1 x 46.5 cm. Location: National Gallery, London, Room 16, inventory no. NG3214, acquired 1917.

Image: https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/follower-of-rembrandt-a-man-seated-reading-at-a-table-in-a-lofty-room [Accessed 26/10/16 at 7.35 pm]

Image 2:

De Chirico: The Enigma of a Day, 1914. Oil on Canvas, 83 x 130cm. Brazil, Museu de Arte Contemporanea da Universidade de Sao Paulo.

Image: http://www.radford.edu/rbarris/art428/surrealism%201.html [Accessed 15/11/16 at 6.05 pm]

Image 3:

Chinese traditional puppet theatre

Image: http://www.theaterfigurenmuseum.de/en/ausstellung/sonderausstellungen/asien.html [Accessed 26/10/16 at 7.21pm]

Image 4:

Modern shadow theatre performers: Attraction

Image: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2333630/Britains-Got-Talent-Attraction-Behind-scenes-amazing-dancers-tipped-win.html [Accessed 15/11/16 at 7.18 pm]

Image 5:

Image of machine used to create silhouettes

Image: –http://cabinetmagazine.org/issues/24/stoichita.php [Accessed 9/11/16 at 6.01pm]

Image 6:

Youngman’ 2012. 1 wooden stepladder, discarded wood, light projector. Sizes: 338.5 x 58 x 213.5 cm (1331/4 x 225/6 x 84 in)

Image: http://www.timnobleandsuewebster.com/youngman_2012.html  [Accessed 18/11/16 at 11.08 am]

Image 7:

Image of artist Peter Callesen creating ‘Transparent God’ 2009.

Image: http://dinby.dk/touristupdate/saa-er-der-igen-adgang-til-hemmelig-bunker-kunst [Accessed 18/11/16 at 10.42 am]

Image 8:

‘Grub for Sharks: A Concession to the Negro Populace’. Date2004. Cut paper. Overall display dimensions variable. Tate – not on display. Presented by the American Fund for the Tate Gallery 2009

Image: – http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/walker-grub-for-sharks-a-concession-to-the-negro-populace-t12906 [Accessed 16/10/16 at 6.45 pm]

Image 9:

Image of Dvd’s front covers of Lotte Reiniger’s films

Image: –https://www.amazon.co.uk/Lotte-Reiniger-Fairy-Tale-Films/dp/B001EJW0UY [Accessed 7/11/16 at 5.55 pm]

Image:-https://www.amazon.co.uk/Adventures-Prince-Achmed-DVD/dp/B00005LIQ7/ref=pd_sbs_74_img_0?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=ASHVFC2A14CJHCCD8ME9  [Accessed 7/11/16 at 6.07 pm]

Image 10:

Image of Illustration by Jan Pienkowski from Pages 2 & 3 from the book A Thousand Nights and One Night, 2007

Image:-http://www.janpienkowski.com/books/papercut/1001/1001nights.htm [Accessed 7/11/16 at 7.12 pm]

Image 11:

‘’Distant Wish’’, 2006. Acid –free A4 115 gsm paper and glue. Size unknown.

Image: http://www.petercallesen.com/paper/a4-papercuts/  [Accessed 28/10/16 at 11:42 am]

Image 12:

‘‘The Game Keeper’s Gibbet’ 2011. Tim Noble & Sue Webster. Solid sterling silver gilded in pure gold, metal stand, light projector plus installation with indirect fluorescent lighting, sculpture: 71 x 42 x 160 cm (27.95 x 16.54 x 62.99 in.

http://weirdfictionreview.com/2012/07/tim-noble-and-sue-webster-give-a-few-extra-turns-of-the-screw/  [Accessed 11/11/16 at 2.20pm]

Image 13:

‘Looking At One City from Two Viewpoints.’ 2001. Rashad Alakbarov. Mixed objects, spot lights, relay switcher, dimensions variable.

Image: http://rashadalakbarov.com/en/works/installations/2001/looking-at-on-city-from-two-viewpoints/ [Accessed 11/11/16 at 14:54 pm]

Image 14:

‘Portrait made of Bottles.’ 2011. Rashad Alakbarov. plastic bottles, spot ligh.t Size unknown

Image: http://rashadalakbarov.com/en/works/installations/2011/bottle-portrait/[Accessed 21/11/16 at 8.02 pm]

Image 15:

City View (close up), 2003, 250 x 500 x 5 cm, aluminum numbers, single light source, shadow (Photo courtesy of Kumi Yamashita)

Image: http://www.forbes.com/sites/yjeanmundelsalle/2015/04/25/kumi-yamashita-plays-with-shadows-to-create-art/#3ec3878166d4 [Accessed 21/11/16 at 8.27 pm]

Image 16:

‘Shadow Dancing’. 2008. Diet Wiegman material rubbish. Size unknown.

Image: http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/21/4130960/the-incredible-shadow-dancing-light-sculptures-of-diet-wiegman [Accessed 21/11/16 at 9.38 pm]

Image 17:

My Cityscape Artefact

Image 18:

My Cityscape Artefact

Appendix B Images: 19 – 28.

Photos of developmental work and process for creating Cityscape Artefact

 

Appendix A

Art Galleries Visited

Paris

Louvre Art Gallery, Paris, France [Visited 2/5/16]

Museum D’Orsay, Paris, France [Visited 4/5/16]

L’Espace Dali, Salvador Dali Sculptures and Graphic Artworks museum, 11 rue Poulbot, Paris 18. [Visited 5/5/16]

York

York Art Gallery, York, England. [Visited 7/6/16]

Yorkshire Museum, York, England. [Visited 7/6/16]

York Castle Museum, York, London. [Visited 26/8/16]

Newcastle

Baltic, Newcastle, England [Visited 20/7/16]

Laing Art Gallery, Newcastle, England [Visited 21/7/16]

London

Tate Modern, London, [Visited 7/8/16]

Victoria and Albert Museum, London. [Visited 8/8/16]

Jerwood Visual Arts Gallery, Jerwood Solo Presentations, London. [Visited 10/8/16]

Reveal Printmakers Art Gallery, London. [Visited 10/8/16]

Middlesbrough

Mima [visited various dates]

Blah Blah [visited various dates]

Yorkshire

Yorkshires Sculpture Park, Wakefield, West Yorkshire [Visited 14/12/16]

Appendix B

Photos of developmental work and process for creating Cityscape Artefact

picture1

First of all I had the idea to use an old frame that I had previously collected for my Artefact. And to incorporate shadows and silhouettes within the piece of artwork I would create.

I wanted to show a dramatic scene within the frame in silhouette form, and the idea of a hot air balloon being tossed around in a storm and people falling out of the balloon and frame, clinging on for dear life just sprung to mind. Also I wished to incorporate a cityscape below it made from recycled materials, casting a shadow on the wall, so using 2D and 3D within the same Artefact.

To achieve a gap in the frame I used a hot air gun to melt the plastic frame and I tried to sculpt a dripping affect at the end of the gap as though it had been melted, this was for another idea I had in mind, that of a hand holding a match.

I had been practising with cutting out silhouettes from black card for other experimental artworks, so was getting better at controlling the scalpel when cutting out intricate pieces. I cut out a hot air balloon and five small figures, in various bodily positions of grasping, sliding and tumbling.

picture1

In order to hang the frame in a tilting position, I screwed metal frame hooks at an angle so the frame was aligned in a falling position, this made it look more realistic.

I then painted the area surrounding the silhouettes with black acrylic paint in order to create movement within the scene, representing swirling wind or a tornado.

To create the 3D cityscape I decided polystyrene would be the best material to use. I did not want it to look perfect and wished it to look rough in appearance this was in order for it to appear childlike as the silhouette figures did. To achieve this I did not draw an outline on the polystyrene but just cut randomly using my gut feeling, with a plaster board saw which also did not produce precise neat cuts, and this created the desired effect.

The shadow was created by a light source pointed onto the cityscape ideally from below. The cityscape could not be placed too near the ground, to achieve the best results, which was to achieve a tall high shadow thrown on the wall behind. Photos of it been taken after daylight created the best effect. Whilst experimenting with places to display my Artefact, unfortunately every room had a window, so I would go after sunset to take photos.

Originally I had only wished to create a shadow of a less than perfect cityscape on the studio wall, but then I had the idea of  the cityscape been on fire, and this image may convey a fire  had contributed to the frame above melting.

picture1

As it was Xmas there were lots of different lights in the shops.

So I experimented with red fairy lights, duck taping them to edges of the polystyrene. It did actually give the slight appearance of flames, jumping from the edges of the cityscape. Also I used a fluorescent light on the floor behind the cityscape, which I had cello taped Perspex sheet over and then painted with red acrylic paint, to produce the appearance of a red glow rising up from the cityscape.

Unfortunately the extra red lights counteracted the shadow been produced and thrown onto the wall. So you could either have the appearance of burning cityscape or a shadow of a cityscape not both at the same time. Two for the price of one as it were.

picture1

The idea of the hand holding the match could now be placed into the composition, in a position that looked as though it had been used to melt the corner of the picture frame. For the match I used a piece of wood with the end painted red initially, but then painted it black as though it had been used. The hand was a manikin hand I found discarded.

The photos on this page are photos with the shadows and without the shadows.

The photo left with the shadows only involved using one white light source pointed directly at the Cityscape artefact from the front.

picture1

Below is a photo of the Cityscape artefact with the fluorescent light, red fairy lights and original white light switched on at the same time.

picture1

So there are two possible effects to choose from when viewing the artefact. The viewer has to only to decide which lights they wish to leave off or on. I encountered problems taking photos in the Waterhouse which I had not previously thought off, because of the windows higher up the walls, I could never totally have the right amount of darkness within the room unless it was night time. Unfortunately the closing times of the Waterhouse didn’t allow for this.

1 Alakbarov, Rashad  http://rashadalakbarov.com/en/biography/ [Accessed 14/10/2016 at 12:52pm]

[2]Casati, Roberto. Translated from the Italian by Abigail Asher, Shadows, Unlocking Their Secrets, from Plato to Our Time. Published by Vintage Books, Random House Inc. New York. 2004. Page 7.

[3] Gombrich, Ernst. Shadows The Depiction of Cast Shadow In Western Art. Published by the National Gallery Publications Limited.1995. [Page 6] published to accompany an exhibition in the Sunley Room at the National Gallery, London 26 April-18 June 1995. [Page 20]

[4] Gombrich, Ernst. Shadows The Depiction of Cast Shadow In Western Art. Published by the National Gallery Publications Limited.1995. [Page 6] published to accompany an exhibition in the Sunley Room at the National Gallery, London 26 April-18 June 1995. [Page 55]

[5] https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2015/sep/27/kara-walker-interview-victoria-miro-gallery-atlanta [Accessed 11/1/17 1.49pm]

[6] http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/10/08/the-shadow-act [Accessed 7/11/16 at 8.17pm]

[7] http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/10/08/the-shadow-act [Accessed 7/11/16 at 8.21pm]

[8] B.F.I. Pamphlet, Published by BFI, 21 Stephen Street, London. [Date unknown] Page 17

[9] B.F.I. Pamphlet, Published by BFI, 21 Stephen Street, London. [Date unknown] Page 18

[10] http://www.booktrust.org.uk/books/children/illustrators/interviews/111  [Accessed 13/01/17 3.22pm]

[11] http://www.arch2o.com/paper-cut-sculptures-peter-callesen/   [Accessed 13/01/17 at 3.30pm]

[12] Noble, Tim. Webster, Sue. ‘Nihilistic Optimistic, Tim Noble & Sue Webster. Published by Blain|Southern. 2012. [Page 17]

[13] Noble, Tim. Webster, Sue. ‘Nihilistic Optimistic, Tim Noble & Sue Webster. Published by Blain|Southern. 2012. [Page 99]

[14] Noble, Tim. Webster Sue. ‘Turning the Seventh Corner’ Published by Blain|Southern. 2011. Published on the occasion of the Exhibition Turning the Seventh Corner. 30th April – 16th July 2011. [Page  33]

[15] http://www.designboom.com/art/kumi-yamashita-interview-03-05-2015 [Accessed 13/1/17 at 9.53am]

1000 Word Dissertation proposal

1000 Word Dissertation proposal

Kieran Woodhouse

P4085770

Module Name: Engaging with Art: Reading, Thinking & Writing in Year Two

Module Code: FAE2013-N

Module Tutor: Jared Pappas-Kelley

Deadline: Wednesday 13th April 2016

shadows

‘Shadows of the Past’ 2016 Photo of my metal pyramid shadow artwork

For my 5,000 word dissertation next year, I will take the sculpture skills I developed this year and apply them to new themes (Shadows, pop art and themes of rural/urban, old/new and plant/building contrasts), materials and practices. Discussing how these themes and contemporary artists relate to my work. I will be doing new things to add to my shadow art works from this year, namely ‘Shadows of the Past’ 2016 and ‘Future Enlightenment’ 2016. [Front cover and Pg. 4]

Pop art which emerged in Britain in the mid 1950’s, could be influential in my dissertation. Also working with famous iconic symbols that are instantly recognisable for example Mickey Mouse, and Diet Wiegman’s ‘Shadow Dancing’ 2008, which is instantly recognisable as Michael Jackson this theme interests me, and I could maybe explore cut-out sections of paintings and books as used by pop artists. I would try similar techniques in my work outside my dissertation, using shapes cut out from a canvas and shining different coloured lights through it to create a colourful pop-art effect.

Expanding on from my second year work, I would like to explore the different uses of shadows and coloured lights in both my practical work and dissertation.

s

Image 1 – Alakbarov’s colourful shadow and light installations which inspire me

Azerbaijani artist Rashad Alakbarov makes monochrome back cityscapes in shadow, similar to my second year work, but made from everyday objects like light bulbs and pipes. I would like to explore how he makes buildings appear more equal/even, with none detracting or standing out more from the others. Alakbarov also uses transparent plastics like water bottles to create different layers and colours of shadow/light, which I would explore in my dissertation.

As Rural/urban, old/new and plant/building contrasts will be part of my research. The idea of returning to a pre-city era and a transition of natural plants and trees into a cityscape is an idea that also interests me.

Light and shadow can give extra emotion/depth to these ideas as well, and to tie plant-based work into my dissertation themes, I can look at Belgian artists Fred Eerdekens. A few of his pieces like ‘Tralala’ (1999) use plants with small cut-out shapes in their foliage to create words in shadow. Between angular corner shapes of city pieces (Alakbarov) and the smooth, gentle shapes of plants (Eerdekens), I can look at more puzzling and distorted shapes like the Sydney Opera House.

h

Image 2 – ‘Tralala’ 1999.

The materials these shadow artists use also inspire me, especially when they use everyday items (a link to the pop art theme) or rubbish. For example, Tim Noble and Sue Webster (Britain) work with turning trash or other mixed things into shadow art.

t

Image 3 – Two figures in shadow of taxidermied animals by Tim noble and Sue Webster.

The way Noble and Webster use light and shadow makes me want to explore this type of art. It is a new and contemporary kind of art, and the way they combine their ideas and explore different layouts of lights/sculptures in installations and can be compared to other artists.  These sculptures are completely different from the shadows they create, which add depth and carry emotional messages for example, the idea of love between two people which is conveyed in the above piece.

Unlike a static painting, shadows can move, change and be tweaked. I think this allows the viewer to gain more from the actual viewing experience within the Gallery. Diet Wiegman [Netherlands] uses this by making small shadow art pieces which rotate to change the shape of the shadow.

e

Image 4 – Shadow dancing 2008 by Diet Wiegman.

Here, he creates a more famous icon [Michael Jackson] rather than a general cityscape or portrait. The shadow moves and changes, forming a shape only for a second. You therefore have to be there to experience the shape being formed so evoking a feeling of anticipation and suspense before the message or inspiration Wiegman wants to convey arrives or is formed.

The effect of different lighting and colours on these pieces is inspiring, and seeing the way artists use all manner of materials and can produce any shape or form from them. Especially when recycled or found/rubbish items are turned into pieces of artwork, which relates to my last artwork ‘Future Enlightenment’ 2016, and architects dream desk, [below – Images 5 and 6]. Which was made from entirely recycled and found objects. [Metal, wood, plastic and concrete.]

The desk was not placed on a plinth but on a mirror under the foot of the desk, the mirror was used in order to show the artwork from below and to reflect the 6 push on and off Led lights I had placed underneath, which I attached by magnets to a metal plate underneath the desk. Under desk lighting shone down onto the floor, to create more shadows, and give it a space ship feel, almost futuristic style.

All the artworks I have discussed and included need a dark place to be exhibited in, and this makes them inflexible. They have to stay in one place, whether on the floor, walls or the ceiling, especially if they are dynamic shadow pieces like Wiegman’s. Being in one part of a room gives them a special space to move, rather than a static painting. Lighting is therefore crucial in this type of art, and combining paintings or images with light and shadow is another new area I am interested in.

For example, Kumi Yamashita (Japan) makes a variety of shadow art pieces using lights from above, below and side, with simple materials like single pieces of paper or small wooden numbers/letters.

r

Image 7 – Creased Japanese Paper, 2011.

Choosing and collecting everyday items like paper [Yamashita] and plastic rubbish items interests me, as these artists take things with no particular shape and use light and shadow to create new shapes.

I have started looking at conceptual art which is relevant to these examples of shadow art and installations. For example, ‘Post-minimalism’ from the 1960s relates to these works because it pushes the boundaries and moves away from the frame of a painting or more minimal artwork.[1] Carl Andre, Joseph Beuys and Robert Smithson used these ideas, removing boundaries to artwork and bringing things from the natural world outside into the gallery, similar to my interest in natural materials [Eerdekens] and rubbish [Alakbarov].[2]

The way artists explore art and modernity through mass-produced and identical shapes also interests me. For example, pop artists like Andy Warhol mass-produce images which both makes them more important but also makes them feel like a wallpaper/background.[3] The way Warhol’s images change every time they are reproduced is similar to the way different shadows can be made from one shape [like Wiegman’s dynamic shadow art]. Making this connection between everyday objects in pop art and shadows in modern artworks, I can expose the connections between everyday objects and their naturally changing shadows in everyday life.

Table of illustrations

Front cover image: My artwork, ‘Shadows of the Past’ [taken 16/3/16 at the Whole Caboodle Exhibition]

Image 1: Alakbarov’s colourful shadow and light installation.

http://twistedsifter.com/2012/01/shadow-art-by-rashad-alakbarov [Accessed 11/3/16, at 10.15am]

Image 2: ‘Tralala’ 1999. http://www.fred-eerdekens.be/?page_id=19

[Accessed 11/03/2016 at 10.31am]

Image 3: Two figures in shadow of taxidermied animals by Tim noble and Sue Webster.

http://developmentofspace.weebly.com/   [Accessed 11/3/16 at 10.58am]

Image 4: ‘Shadow dancing’ 2008 by Diet Wiegman, http://dietwiegman.tumblr.com/light%20sculptures [Accessed 11/3/16 at 11.05am]

Image 5: My artwork, ‘Future Enlightenment’ 2016, with lighting. [Taken 16/3/16 at the Whole Caboodle Exhibition]

Image 6: My Artwork ‘Future Enlightenment’ 2016, without lighting. [Taken 16/3/16 at the Whole Caboodle Exhibition]

Image 7: ‘Creased Japanese Paper’ 2011. http://twistedsifter.com/2012/05/mind-blowing-shadow-art-by-kumi-yamashita  [Accessed 11/3/16 at 11.42am]

Bibliography

Primary Sources [eg. Exhibitions, contact artist directly, interviews]

Secondary Sources [eg. Books, Websites, Journals, Films.]

Books:

Dawtrey, Liz. Jackson, Toby. Masterton, Meecham Pam, Paul. And Wood, Paul. Investigating Modern Art.-Practises & Debates. America. Published by Yale University press 1996 common. Page 132.

Perry, Gill and Wood, Paul. Themes in Contemporary Art. America. Published by .Yale University Press 2004. Pages 11 and 13.

Tim Noble & Sue Webster

Metzger, Gustav. Savage, Jon. Obrist, Hans-Ulrich. Nihilistic Optimistic – Tim Noble & Sue Webster. London. Published by Blain/Southern 2012, on the occasion of the exhibition, 10th October – 24th November 2012

Putman, James. Adjaye, David & Elderton, Louisa.  Tim Noble & Sue Webster – Turning the Seventh Corner. London. Published by Blain/Southern. 2011.

Yablonsky, Contributor Linda. Gioni, Massimiliano & Marta, Karen. Tim Noble & Sue Webster: 2000 words. Published by Kentro Synchronis. 2015

Noble, Tim. Ofili, Chris & Webster, Sue. Fractured Figure. Published by Deitch Projects. 2008.

Articles and other printed material e.g. Journals etc.

Film and videos:

Audio tapes:

Additional material e.g. websites etc.

Websites:

‘Shadow Art’, Twisted Sifter – Rashad Alakbarov. http://twistedsifter.com/2012/01/shadow-art-by-rashad-alakbarov [Accessed 11/3/16, at 10.15am]

‘‘Tralala’ (1999)’, Fred Eerdekens. http://www.fred-eerdekens.be/?page_id=19

[Accessed 11/03/2016 at 10.31am]

‘Taxidermied Animals’, Development of Space – Tim Noble and Sue Webster. http://developmentofspace.weebly.com/   [Accessed 11/3/16 at 10.58am]

‘Shadow dancing, 2008’, Diet Wiegman. http://dietwiegman.tumblr.com/light%20sculptures [Accessed 11/3/16 at 11.05am]

‘Creased Japanese Paper, 2011’, Twisted Sifter – Kumi Yamashita. http://twistedsifter.com/2012/05/mind-blowing-shadow-art-by-kumi-yamashita  [Accessed 11/3/16 at 11.42am]

[1] p.11, Themes in Contemporary Art, eds. Gill Perry and Paul Wood

[2] P.13, Themes in Contemporary Art, eds. Gill Perry and Paul Wood

[3] p.132, Investigating Modern Art, eds. Dawtrey, Jackson, Masterton, Meecham and Wood

Statement of Intent

The aim of this project is to develop my skills from studio practice A for example using different techniques in the metal workshop. Whilst also firstly learning to plan more prior to making my sculptures, by drawing and working out measurements before construction. I have based my artworks theme on architecture, one represents the old architectural ruins of pyramids, castles and cathedrals, and the second is very modern. I have shown the differences in the smallest details and different materials I have used, to emphasise the contrasts in both. The first sculpture represents old ruins and how time can negatively affect the state of the architecture. I chose materials that would be easy to shape which I then welded together. The work I have produced is based on a church spire and the light I have inserted within the sculpture throws shadows outside the structure that have a religious element with varying sized turrets that almost always are present on ancient castles. The tower is made from metal poles welded together in a pyramid shape with long sheets of metal welded and pressed onto the tower sides.

pyramid show
The metal sheets have then been cut with a knife press into different shapes to create shadows that will shine onto the gallery floor and walls.

dream desk show

The second sculpture which uses more modern materials is in direct contrast to the first, which I have named my dream desk. It represents a modern architect’s desk made from materials that are available today and were not available hundreds of years ago.

Research:

Research for studio practice B has been a practical approach experimenting with different materials and methods, some have been successful and some haven’t worked as well. I have firstly tried working with wax to create a 3D tower however it didn’t work because it was too brittle therefore I decided not to carry on with this approach and stick to plastic, wood and metal, as they are more sturdy materials. Although this didn’t work out, it was a helpful learning curve for the future. Subsequently I have stuck with working with metal as this is my main interest and I wanted to develop my skills. I have worked closely with the metal technician Craig and my tutor Lewis to perfect old skills and learn new skills for example the laser cutter. Lewis also recommended me to try out woodwork which has worked very well as it has enhanced my project by bringing in a different material, and a sculpture quite different from the metal pyramid piece in both look and materials, but is still in keeping with my theme of architecture. Additionally I have also spent time working with third year fine art students to get advice and inspiration. I found this helpful as they gave me good suggestions on exhibiting my work, in order to make it more visually pleasing. They have also given me plenty of ideas for my project to grow and move forward.

Visual Research

For visual research, I took photos of new, brightly coloured buildings and old and new architecture that was pyramid shaped, as my artwork relates to both. These were taken in Middlesbrough, Darlington, Redcar, York and Newcastle

a

Photo of Middlesbrough college building, taken on 29/02/2016

 

RedCar

Redcar Tower Clock, taken on 08/02/2016

 

Theoretical Research

I have also done more secondary research on new artists relating to my Studio Practice B works: Nancy Graves, David Umemoto and Oliver Kruze.

Nancy Graves was an American sculptor who lived from 1939 to 1995. She liked to use found materials and recycle them to make her sculptures, she cut them up changing them to make her brightly coloured sculptures, as I did for my dream desk. These sculptures are both made from steel and aluminium and painted with urethane paint.

graves

‘Nike’, 1983, Nancy Graves

She had some idea to start with, based on plants but it still seems very random, akin to a controlled mess.

graves 2

‘Trace’ 1981, Nancy Graves

Graves seemed like an independent woman who based her artwork on a lot of different things and didn’t want to stick to one theme such as feminism or any particular art theory.Graves has done a lot of metalwork sculptures which resemble bright and colourful plants from exotic countries. The strands of this artwork look like they are struggling to hold themselves up / hanging on a thread which are different from my artwork which is structurally sounder.

Both pieces could look top heavy and a mishmash of materials and colours, which could look unappealing as it is busy and confusing to the viewer but I think that makes them interesting as well.

David Umemoto is an architect and sculptor from Canada who works in brutalist concrete art. This style of ‘brutalism’ refers to architecture and buildings which many people don’t like, as it looks half-finished and doesn’t look too nice.

His work revolves around the idea of a universal set of rules and systems which everyone has to follow and ways they have to live their lives. He calls this a modular system.

His work is very intricate and confusing, e.g., stairs on a wall which lead nowhere and odd shapes. Like Graves’ work, it is a controlled, ‘strange’ mess. This relates to the complex shadows produced from my pyramid piece and the architectural themes of Umemoto, also relates continually through my 2nd year works. I like the way his small pieces lock together which could inspire my future work next year.

umemoto 1

‘Interior I’, David Umemoto

Umemoto’s work is an organic process, a set-up which creates a building from cluttered pieces which still look half-done, especially with the edgy bumps around it. This would not work on a life-size building, but works aesthetically well with these pieces like building blocks for Lego.

umemoto 2

‘Friche I’, David Umemoto

I am inspired by how many different shapes he uses within an artwork, the finished pieces look as though a lot of thought has been put into them. These shapes remind me of buildings that I see every day, tower blocks from the brutalist art movement, but with a twist as the maze like structure’s and corridors go nowhere, shapes are added so well that ugly concrete structures are made beautiful. The ‘Friche I’ piece to the right looks like a clock tower or totem pole.

Oliver Kruse was born in Nuremburg in 1965 and has worked as a carpenter and artist in both Germany and Britain. Made out of wood, these pieces look like a wooden house where the pieces have been moulded into each other as if melting. This allows him to still use simple shapes but create a different design and a form of shelter like a bandstand.

kruze 1

‘Interfere’ by Oliver Kruse and students & staff at Peter Behrens School of Architecture. On View: Spring 2011-Present

These pieces are more complicated than my work but are still interesting. Kruse by placing his sculptures outside rather than in a gallery, exposes viewers to the elements. You can also walk in and around the sculpture, with the artwork changing during different weather conditions, snow etc., and the landscape becomes part of the work – this changes how you feel about it.

kruze 2

‘Interrelate’ by Oliver Kruse, St Moritz, 2015

Curatorial presentation:

presentation 1

The exhibition was held 16-18th March at the Arc in Stockton. The three pieces I exhibited were ‘Shadows of the Past’, ‘Future Enlightenment’ and ‘Demolition Crew’. The picture on the left shows me with ‘Shadows’ and ‘Future Enlightenment’ at the Arc. (Taken 16/03/2016)

I chose these three pieces because they all show the past and future themes of my work and my interest in architecture/buildings.

The first part of my work involved painting plinths white, of varied size that would bring each piece closer, to the eye level of the viewer, making it easier to get an idea of how my sculptures were made.  The white plinths complemented the gallery walls, allowing my artwork with its darker colours to stand out more. This especially applies to my large metalwork piece,

presentation 2

‘Shadows of the Past’ 2016 (Steel rods and plates welded together)

 

To control the exhibition space, I blacked out the window with white presentation boards to try to darken the space. I also attached a ‘Please do not touch the artwork’ sign to the plinth as the metal sheeting had very sharp edges. Placing a square mirror the same size as the plinth in the base of ‘Shadows’, helped as I had designed this piece so to project light from within the pyramid, and throw shadows onto the two corner walls. Though the exhibition space was not ideal, as it was to light and there was only one place I could really display it, because the gallery had floor to ceiling windows, some shadows were still cast on the exhibition walls as intended.

dream desk presentation

This piece was not placed on a plinth but on a mirror in the shape of a puddle. I did this to show the artwork from below and reflect the 6 on/off LEDs placed under the desk. Lighting beneath the desk also shone down onto the floor, creating more shadows and giving the piece a ‘spaceship feel’ / almost futuristic style.

demolition crew

‘Demolition Crew’ 2015 (Welded metal tower)

I placed this piece close to the wall in order to replicate the positioning of my other sculptures, and a tall white plinth placed it at eye level. This also helped it throw shadows on the gallery walls, which was an unplanned bonus.

The positioning of my sculptures were all led by my largest the pyramid as this was to be my centre piece, and because this sculpture was to throw shadows on to the walls to add more depth to the piece, it had to be placed in close proximity to the wall. So my other works were also similarly positioned to complement each other, also the theatre door/fire exit and stairs could not be obstructed so this was also taken into consideration in positioning my three pieces.

Techniques & Methods of Working:

The aim of project B was to continue on using the skill set that I have developed and enhance this. I have mainly worked in the metal workshop and have used many different techniques, for example my welding skills have developed as this was my main technique to join pieces of metal together to create the 3D sculpture. However this term I have learnt to use different types of welders to create the best outcome, I have used both the MIG welder for larger pieces and also the spot welder for finer pieces, which I found challenging due to it needing to be neat. This term I have also learnt to cut and shape metal as this wasn’t a skill I acquired in project A. I have learnt how to use the cutting knife to cut strong pieces of metal into the shape I wanted. More challengingly I have learnt to use the laser cutter to cut precise shapes using a computer software to create patterns in plastic that represent cityscapes. These patterns were then added to the metal and wood sculpture, and using light sources shadows will be thrown down on the gallery floor. I have also used this machine to cut a hole in the plastic to fit a light source in neatly.

Another area I have developed is woodwork as this was recommended by Lewis to enhance my project. One machine I have learnt to use is the drill which puts holes in the wood so that screws can be placed in to join wood together. Additionally I have learnt to use sanders which I used to smooth the wood and also make it smaller if necessary. Smaller sanders have been used to make the drilled holes bigger to be able to fit wire and also lightbulbs through. I have also perfected my skills using the band saw to cut plastic and wood to the size I wanted.

Evaluation:

Work has been going well this semester, and I have become more comfortable with how much time I have to finish each piece. Experience of exhibiting has also been helpful and I am looking forward to coming back and doing more artwork next year. Written work is something I have struggled with, but discussing my artwork with lecturers and other students has helped me focus more on how I develop my artwork.

Working on the Arc exhibition in a group, however, was still challenging, as we disagreed over where to place our artwork.

Gaining new skills like metalwork has been very enjoyable, and working with more plastic and metal models is something I look forward to more next year. The workshop has given me some problems with my work – if there are problems with tools or machines, it can be difficult to be precise or check my work, meaning I end up rushing or making mistakes.

I have done more sculptures than painting this year. I became more interested in working with both hands and being more physical than painting. Working this way is also quicker for me than the drawing-like techniques of using one hand to paint. Visiting artist lectures have helped inspire me – though they are hard to relate to my work, their skills are valuable and I try to use these to develop my own style rather than simply copying their ideas.

Next year I would like to progress my shadow artworks and recycled rubbish theme further, building on from the works I have produced this year. Experimenting with more complex detailed shadows and sculptural works, hopefully so producing more in depth quality artworks, through attending workshops that will enhance my sculptural and practical workshop skills and also researching artists who work within a similar field and theme.

Bibliography:

Workshops

Wax workshops: Lewis Robinson.

Metal workshop: Lewis Robinson and Julian Wild.

Casting workshop/Rock modelling: Lewis Robinson.

Plastic workshop: Lewis Robinson.

Plaster workshop: Lewis Robinson.

Walking the streets workshop/Printing workshop: Alice Fox.

Aluminium casting workshop: Lewis Robinson.

 

Websites

Brutalism, Open University – http://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history/heritage/brutalism [Accessed 10/03/2016]

Nancy Graves, ‘Trace’, 1981 – http://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/nancy-graves-1940-1995-110-c-v2ycfyumcn [Accessed 10/03/2016]

Nancy Graves, ‘Nike’, 1983 – http://collections.lacma.org/node/251582 [Accessed 10/03/2016]

David Umemoto, ‘Friche I’ – http://davidumemoto.com/friche-i [Accessed 10/03/2016]

David Umemoto, ‘interior I’ – http://davidumemoto.com/interior-i [Accessed 10/03/2016]

Oliver Kruse and students & staff at Peter Behrens School of Architecture, ‘Interfere’ – http://www.artomi.org/page.php?Interfere-by-Oliver-Kruse-24 [Accessed 10/03/2016]

Oliver Kruse, ‘Interrelate’ – http://www.stmoritzartmasters.com/walk-of-art/walk-of-art-365-days/st-moritz-oliver-kruse.html [Accessed 10/03/2016]

 

Books

Laura Oldfield Ford, Savage Messiah. London, Verso, 2011.

Brian Dillon, Ruin Lust. London, Tate Gallery Publishing, 2014.

Franzen, Brigette & Lager, Annette. Nancy Graves Project: & Special Guests. Publishd by HATJE CANTZ VERLAG GMBH & CO KG. 2013.

Nochlin, Linda. Lyon, Christopher & Hunter, Christina. Nancy Graves. Published by Mitchell-Innes & Nash. 2015

 

Visual Research/Exhibitions Visited

Working with third year students to gain advice and inspiration.

Mima Art Gallery.

Visit with Paul Merrick to Navigating North.

Python Galleries, Middlesbrough.

The House of Blah Blah, Middlesbrough.

Forbes Buildings, Middlesbrough.

The Hill Street Centre Gallery, Steve Irwin’s art plus 6 other artist, Exhibition: – Malfunctioning Authenticities.

The Arc Stockton. Exhibition:-The Illusion of Time, combining the work of 7 artist’s.

The Hill Street Centre, Unit 41. Exhibition:-Primer, Hosted by Zach Champion and 3 other artists.

York Art Gallery, York City, England. [Visited 21/3/16].

Baltic Centre for contemporary art, Newcastle, England. [Visited 25/3/16].

Laing Gallery, Newcastle, England. [Visited 25/3/16].

Visits to Redcar, Darlington and Middlesbrough College to photograph buildings new and old (2 photos used above).

Visits to old castles, Church’s/Abbey’s and ancient ruins in the North East of England to take photographs for research purposes.

 

Visiting Artists

Dryden Goodwin: landscape drawing.

Julian Wild: sculptural work.

Stephan Gill: photography work.

Alistair Hudson and Pavel Buchler: useful v useless art.

Assemble turner prize winners: architects.

Eleanor Wright’s: photography work.

Negotiated Essay 3000 words

Modern castles in the sky and ruins on the ground.
An essay about four architecturally inspired artists, who in turn, have inspired and informed my art. NEGOTIATED ESSAY: 3000 WORDS

Module Name: Engaging with Art: Reading,
Thinking & Writing in Year Two
Module Code: FAE2013-N
Module Tutor: Jared Pappas-Kelley

Front Cover image

‘I felt that the decrepit state of these once magnificent buildings, with their broken gutters, walls blackened by rainwater, crumbing plaster revealing the coarse masonry beneath it, windows boarded up or clad with corrugated iron, precisely reflected my own state of mind’.
(W.G. Sebald, Austerlitz 2001)

 

 

Introduction
This essay will discuss the work of four contemporary artists in relation to my own studio practice, comparing and contrasting their work to my own. The four artists that have been addressed are Laura Oldfield Ford, Frederic Daty, Jane and Louise Wilson and Rachel Whiteread. They have been chosen because I find their work inspirational and also I feel I can learn a lot from their method of working which I feel will benefit my own processes of producing art.
Chapter 1 : Laura Oldfield Ford
My first contemporary artist I am going to explore is Laura Oldfield Ford. Her aim for her Coventry project was an “investigation into the marginal, a process of burrowing under the heritage version of England to uncover the repressed psyche of a land. I want to ask how far are the marginal political ideologies that emerge in the fraying edges of our cities a product of that environment and what new discourses are fomenting in the liminal zones of the commuter belt.” These aims are similar to mine as I also am interested in English Heritage and the repressed state of many architectural pieces. However Oldfield Ford tries to recover the history of repressed modern buildings whereas I go on a quest of discovery of castles and ruins. English Heritage is a particular interest of mine as it a highly sort out tourist attraction whereas more modern ruins are seen as neglected areas that are commonly described as eyesores to the public.
Laura Oldfield Ford conducted her work by taking short journeys through specific sites of cultural and socio-political significance relating to radical counterculture, land contestation and marginal political ideologies within Surrey. She produced paintings as well as a written text pieces (see table of illustrations image 1). Areas included: derelict airfields (Wisley), abandoned military sites (Deepdene Bunker, Dunsfold Aerodrome), land-grabbed commons (St. George’s Hill, Cobham), islands in the Thames (Ham Island, Eel Pie Island, Swan Island, Alcott House), and housing schemes (Cambridge Road and Kingsnympton Estates) . Her work predominantly concentrates on modern ruins. There are elements of this in my own project, however I also include traditional old ruins of castles and abbeys. I feel these traditional ruins express elements of English history, however I understand that modern ruins such as housing schemes abandoned military sites may be easier to relate to because they can be seen everywhere but are chosen to be ignored and not seen as a piece of history compared to castles. I chose to portray older architecture in my own work as I feel they are more likely to be forgotten about as they are not as common in the everyday venture.
Explaining the interests and influences of her work Laura Oldfield Ford has said: ‘I am interested in places that are derelict, laid to waste. I’m interested in how places respond to economic fluctuations, and how the potential for radically different ways of engaging with those spaces can emerge’ . I have the same interest in derelict and wasted land however my work does not deal with the economic aspect of ruins. In the same interview Oldfield Ford stated ‘Already many of the 60s and 70s builds are seen as failures and ruins, they have been starved of investment and left to fall into a state of chronic disrepair and the architecture has been wrongly maligned in most cases’ This can be seen in the Brutalist Movement which is from the 1960s and 1970s and includes a prominent stance of commonly described as unsightly concrete eye saws of architecture abandoned due to economic downfalls. This particular movement has influenced me in my view of ruins and it widens my initial knowledge of ruins being only ancient castles and abbeys. I am particularly interested in the raw structure which can be seen inside a partially destroyed tower block from this era to which I have produced one of my metal structures on.
Oldfield Ford’s method of working is to draw over photographs of broken down buildings with a history behind them in ink, this as a form of protest to modern architects who she feels are pulling down history to build lifeless modern buildings. This is similar to my own way of working except that I aim to show the wrecked buildings in a more positive light. Many of the buildings I portray are still in use, for example as museums pieces like Whitby Abbey, whereas Oldfield Ford’s buildings are empty and lifeless.
Another area that is different is Laura Oldfield Ford uses photography with written text over and also drawing whereas I produce sculptural models made from metal and plaster, along with line drawings. I feel because she only uses pictures the audience does not get a full sense of the building, in particular its connection to space. However it can be said that her black and white photographs are more serious whereas models are more playful, lessening the message of the loss of history in architecture destruction. Oldfield Ford also produced a project of drawings on watercolour paper, made in pencil and chalk with acrylic ink. These pieces have similar margins to mine as she predominantly uses greys, black and white shadings whereas I keep my line drawings purely black and white. I feel only using basic colours does not distract from the architecture of the drawing. In her drawing of M6 Junction 9, Bescot 6, 2011(see table of illustrations image 2) she has added some bright colours on a small area of the drawing. I like this as it adds a sense of graffiti to the derelict modern ruin, and I did try adding colour to my own project. However I found it did not have the same effect as the pure graphite line drawings since these also lend a sense of architectural blue print drawings of a building.
Chapter 2 : Frederic Daty
The second contemporary artist I have chosen is Frederic Daty who is interested in the relationship between humans and their environment. He produces wall sculptures made of light raw steel plates cut, weathered, sanded and welded. The natural colour is preserved and the work is then hung with simple hooks. His work keeps only the structure, the skeleton, seen in raw steel and he shows the energy of the work shown through the shadows and light cascading off it. His work is sectioned into a number of themes: ‘Birdview’, Bubble City’, ‘Root City’, ‘Lit Cocoon’ and ‘Vegetal Web’. To deal with one theme of the work in more depth Bubble City’ represents a single celled organism from the perspective of a wide angle, so that the organism becomes seen as a giant bubble (seen in the table of illustrations image 3). The city seen in the wall hanging takes on the shape of a protective cocoon which invites the viewer to enter the walls and explore the city but on a much smaller scale seen as a bubble. I am particularly attracted to the way in which he creates shapes from metal to portray his ideas. I like the clean edges of the work which give them a smooth look. It has inspired me to attempt to create more interesting shapes in my own metal work.
In an autobiographical writing on Fredric Daty’s website he explained the concept of his work,
‘Confronted with an overload of images, an invasion of colours, a pouring out of futile information, my goal is to reinterpret the reality and break it down into its fundamental pieces. The medium I have chosen is a raw, primal material, without artifice and faddish coverings. I would like my work to be the opposite of a cluttered mind and soul, wrapped in superficial layers. My work contains stylized shapes and forms in an effort to be simple, clear and pure.’
Both Daty’s and my own work are similar in as much as we both portray architectural scenes in a stripped back sense, only involving the raw construction through metal sculptures. Daty produces large scale wall hangings which, while striking, are abstract, whereas I produce 3D sculptures which are more lifelike and realistic of architectural scenes. It can be said, however, Daty’s more abstract and less lifelike work draws the audience in as they attempt to work out what the metal structure is portraying.
In his first UK solo show 2014 called Trinity involved iconic London city scenes were interpreted in metal sculptures – from Westminster and Big Ben, to Piccadilly Circus and stations across the capital, such as Borough and Canary Wharf. Trinity explored the idea of stripping the scene down to its structure, presenting the city as a skeleton carved from raw hand-cut steel. On the collection, Daty states:
“I would like my work to be the opposite of a cluttered mind and soul. Simplicity in the clearly defined shapes and lines is first meant to be pleasing to the eye, but its purpose is to make the viewer stay, rest, and contemplate the subtleties in their own lives, to enter into their own memories and reflect in the spiritual realm, things we can only do if we are still”
It is clear to me that Daty has kept his work to one medium to keep it simple and easy for the viewer to understand and digest. This approach can be good as not everyone has the time to stand and try and work out the meaning of an artwork. In this way more people will see the work as pleasing to the eye. By contrast my work involves a number of mediums from sculptures and line drawings which takes longer for the viewer to digest. Both approaches work however I can argue using more than one medium as it can show more thought has been put into the work as I have looked at how the idea can be expressed in different methods.
Chapter 3 : Jane and Louise Wilson
The work from young British Artists and identical twins Jane and Louise Wilson explore different abandoned landscapes from former Nazi interrogation rooms to failed redevelopment areas. Their work includes multi-screen video installations and photography of altered states that have once been populated by people, some with evil histories such as Nazi leader’s military bunkers but now have been left abandoned therefore leaving lingering energy and a sense of paranoia (see in table of illustrations image 4). They are most famous for their project based on Chernobyl. They visited the area several times to gather as much primary evidence as possible. Describing their visit to Chernobyl, they have said ‘When you visit Chernobyl. Which is quite amazing due to the voracity of nature where there was once a road now there are plants and weeds. All that green is quite shocking for that first visit.’ Both the twins and I gather the primary evidence from the site to enhance our knowledge of the environment. I also believe it is important to visit the landscape around which you intend to base your artwork as it will give a close insight into the environment and is the best source of evidence.
The twins’ work include photographs of the interior of the buildings whereas I prefer to concentrate on photographs of the exterior of abandoned buildings. However I feel the approach to photographing inside the building does give a stronger sense of loss because the picture scenes which should be busy and full of people for example classrooms are now empty (see table of illustrations images 5). It can be also said that their work using insides of buildings provides more and therefore can be said to be more interesting as they tell more of a story. However, it is also true that images of buildings taken from the outside, for example the photographs of the castles I have taken, show more secrets and are ambiguous as you cannot see inside, such as seen as the images of Whitby Abbey. I take inspiration from their work as it makes me think of the style of photography I have used to base my line drawings as it extends my thinking further than what you see initially.
According to an article in the Guardian describing the twins’ work installed in the Whitworth Art Gallery, Manchester 2013. ‘It is hard not to feel the sadness of the world here, the misery of the modern age’ . It can be said that time is needed for any growth or development, however time can be bad for buildings as they may change drastically, become no longer inhabitable, something seen in both my work and also the twins’. However there are differences in the reasons why these landscapes have been ruined, Jane and Louise’s work portrays results of a horrificaly and purposely carried out action from nuclear bomb whereas the destruction of my work is through years of neglect, approaches which together pose of the question of which might be worse.
Chapter 4 : Rachael Whiteread
A fourth and final artist that I am interested in is Rachel Whiteread. Her sculptures are casts made from materials like concrete, plaster, resin, rubber, polystyrene, polyester resin and pigmented urethane and urethane filler. The sculptures represent the negative spaces found within architecture, rooms or, staircases (see table of illustration image 6), furniture etc., thus converting them into positive spaces.
The architecture, furniture is destroyed in the making of the artworks, as they have to be taken apart in order to reveal the artworks within them.
In the first stage of Whiteread work she produces vast amounts of 2D work drawings, photographs etc., these are seen as studies made of an exploration of a theme that will eventually link to her final piece of work.
Like Rachel Whitehead, I also like to take vast amounts of photographs that may not necessarily relate to my final pieces of artwork. In my case these aid my creativity, as I explore through photography and pencil drawings, my chosen architectural themes, which are architectural ruin and decay, both in historical and newer buildings, as Whitehead’s photography does. Whiteread will photograph ruins in Greece and terraced houses in Britain concentrating on external structures attached to architecture, such as metal fire escapes, in preparation for creating her architectural inside out pieces.
Most of the objects she uses for casting her pieces, cannot be saved as they are ruined in the process of creation. They are used as moulds that surround the negative space, which is then filled with concrete, which originally had only held air, as in the case of ‘House’. Within the void of the building, room or furniture, she builds an internal skin to hold the concrete, so that the sculpture is actually hollow. But the sculpture still shows in detail the walls, light plugs, windows etc. of the house. In the case of the ‘House’ 1993, it was demolished bit by bit once the interior of the house had been cast which took a month, and the concrete had set which took a further 10 days.
‘House’ (1993) is Whiteread’s most famous piece. It is her largest and most ambitious work. It was her first public sculpture and was responsible for transforming her from a relatively unknown artist to a household name (see in table of illustrations image 7).
The idea for ‘House’ came to her three years earlier a few weeks after completing her ‘Ghost’ work, which involved the concrete casting of one room’s negative space. ‘House’ was a continuation of her earlier work ‘Ghost’, (see in table of illustrations image 8) as the elements of that became an integral part of this work.
Rachael Whiteread was awarded the Turner Prize on the 23rd November 1993 for House, the very day that Bow Council decided not to grant the ‘House’ the stay of demolition order. Whiteread managed to delay the demolition until 12th January 1994, so it had a chance to be seen by many more people before it was destroyed, she had wanted it to stay and become part of the fabric of the neighbourhood, but still to be only a temporary structure.
‘House was a mute memorial for the area and its history, and a tomb that visualised the darker side of domestic life. But it also came to be a pawn in the political discourse, and was called variously a ‘bunker’, and ‘eyesore’, a ‘mausoleum’, and an ‘exceptional work of art’. It was clever yet simple, a monument to thoughts and dreams and sensations a human-sized foil to the faceless scale of Canary Wharf, And suddenly it was gone.’
The sculpture House finally became neglected and covered in graffiti and housing wildlife. Sadly all the effort Whiteread put in over the three and a half years of creating the idea and the four months it took to build, only thirty minutes were needed for the sculpture to be taken down and destroyed.

Conclusion
As an overall conclusion my work is an insight into traditional architecture for examples castles and abbeys, and how they are now viewed as ruins because of their years of decay and deterioration. However this is very rarely covered by contemporary artists, as such areas are now portrayed in a more modern sense and ruins are seen in derelict buildings from the Brutalist Movement in the 1960s and 1970s. Art that covers castles and ruins are more traditional artists such as William Turner from the 18th Century and John Piper in the 1970s and 1980s. I think the Historical Ruins of today that have survived the ravages of time, are seen as precious and of great value, as tourist attractions to generate money in order to preserve and restore the said architectures. As opposed to modern ruins, which are seen as, a blot on the landscape and structurally hazardous, and can be visited free and carry no value at all to society. I also feel both modern and ancient ruins, can be equally a thing of beauty, architecturally and visually, and in my present Studio Practise modules I am trying to convey this message via my varied artworks in plaster, print, metal work and illustrations.
I have found monumental inspiration from the four artists I have explored in this essay, all in different ways. Frederic Daty has inspired me to develop my metal work and create more complex designs using difficult techniques of cutting and welding. Work from both Laura Oldfield Ford and the Wilson twins have inspired me to look further than castles and explore other formats of ‘destruction’ and ‘ruins’. Finally Rachel Whiteread looks at the use of negative space in a structural sense therefore this widens my scope on my own workings of negative space done purely on my line drawings.

Word Count 3,258

Table of illustrations
Images
Front cover image: – My own photograph of Whitby Abbey.

Image 1:

Image 2- Laura Oldfield Ford M6 Junction 9, Bescot 2011

Laura Oldfield Ford M6 Junction 9, Bescot 2011

Above image: Laura Oldfield Ford Ferrier Estate (detail) 2010 http://www.stanleypickergallery.org/news/laura-oldfield-ford-stanley-picker-fellow-at-tate-britain/ [date and time accessed 23/01/2016, 4.45pm]
Laura Oldfield Ford: Stanley Picker Fellow at Tate Britain Spring 2014
Ruin Lust until 18 May 2014

Image 2:

Image 2- Laura Oldfield Ford M6 Junction 9, Bescot 2011

Laura Oldfield Ford M6 Junction 9, Bescot 2011

Above image: Laura Oldfield Ford M6 Junction 9, Bescot (2011) chalk, acrylic and ink on watercolour paper.
http://www.stanleypickergallery.org/news/new-stanley-picker-fellowship-appointments-2013/
[date and time accessed 23/01/2016, 5.17pm]
In the Collection of Moses Luski

Image 3:

Image 3- Frederic City Ville Bulle 5#5

Frederic Daty Bubble City- Ville Bulle 5#5

Bubble City- Ville Bulle 5#5, size: 120/109/12cm
http://www.maison-objet.com/en/paris/exhibitors/september-2015/frederic-daty?offset=55
[date and time accessed 05/02/2016 10:45am]

Image 4:

Image 4- Jane and Louise Wilson Bunker Mentality 2006

Jane and Louise Wilson Bunker mentality: ‘Azeville’ (2006)

Bunker mentality: ‘Azeville’ (2006) by Jane and Louise Wilson Jane and Louise Wilson/Tate
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/broken-britain-ruins-inspire-at-the-tate-britain-9179851.html [date and time accessed 23/01/2016, 5.29pm]

Image 5:

Image 5- Jane and Louise Wilson Atomgrad 2010

Jane and Louise Wilson, Atomgrad (Nature Abhors a Vacuum), 2010

Jane and Louise Wilson, Atomgrad (Nature Abhors a Vacuum), 2010
http://www.creativetourist.com/articles/art/manchester/jane-and-louise-wilson-at-the-whitworth-homage-to-chernobyl/ [date and time accessed 05/02/2016 at 10:30am]

Image 6:

Image 6- Untitled (stairs) 2001

Rachel Whiteread Untitled (stairs) 2001

Untitled (Stairs) 2001
http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/whiteread-untitled-stairs-t07939 [date and time accessed 23/01/2016, 4.07pm]

Image 7:

Image 7- Rachel Whiteread House (1993)

Rachel Whiteread House 1993

House (1993), Rachel Whiteread © Rachel Whiteread / Photo Sue Omerod
http://www.apollo-magazine.com/house/ [date and time accessed 23/01/2016, 3.38pm]

Image 8:

Image 8- Rachel Whiteread Ghost 1990

Rachel Whiteread Ghost 1990

Ghost 1990
http://www.saatchigallery.com/aipe/rachel_whiteread.htm
[date and time accessed 23/01/2016. 4.33pm]
Ghost 1990 Plaster on steel frame 269 x 355.5 x 317.5 cm 106 x 140 x 125″

Bibliography
Primary Sources [e.g. Exhibitions, Contact artist directly, interviews etc.]

Exhibitions
Daty, Frederic .Exhibition Saturday 31st October 2015, opening night, Trinity Exhibition. Castle Galleries, 19 Castlegate, the Coppergate Centre, York.
Contact artist directly
Daty, Frederick. Facebook and E mail: frederic@daty.org
Oldfield-Ford, Laura. E mail: Lauraoldfield@gmail.com

Secondary Sources [e.g. Books, Websites, Journals, Films etc.].

Books
Oldfield-Ford, Laura
Oldfield Ford, Laura. Savage Messiah. Image and text. London. Published by Verso, 2011.
Books
Whiteread, Rachael
Dillon, Brain. Ruin Lust. Image and text. London: Tate Publishing, 2014. [Pages 30, 31]
Hal Foster, Rosalind E. Krauss. Art since1900: modernism, anti-modernism, postmodernism. Image and text. London. Published by Thames and Hudson Ltd, 2012. [Pages. 681-683]
Mullins, Charlotte. Rachel Whiteread. Image and text. London: Tate publishing, 2004. [Pages. 38–57]
Books
Wilson, Jane and Louise
Corrin, Lisa G. Jane and Louise Wilson. Image and text. London. Published by Serpentine Gallery. 1999. Catalogue published to accompany the exhibition Jane & Louise Wilson. 14th September – 31st October 1999.
Dillon, Brain. Ruin Lust. Image and text. London: Tate Publishing, 2014. [Pages 52-55]
Millar, Jeremy and Doherty, Claire. Jane and Louise Wilson, with essays by Jeremy Millar and Claire Doherty. Image and text. London. Published by Ellipsis London Limited. 2000.

Websites
Corden, Gerry. ‘Estate: an inaccessible wilderness, mundane and sublime: Gerry in Art, Nature & Environment’
https://gerryco23.wordpress.com/2014/01/21/soft-estate-an-inaccessible-wilderness-mundane-and-sublime/ [date and time accessed: 11/12/2015, 11.41am]

Daty, Frederic, Artists Home page shows his artwork themes, http://fredericdaty.com/en/home-4/ [date and time accessed 11/12/2015, 11.57 am]

Daty, Frederic ‘Trinity Exhibition’ http://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/trinity-by-frederic-daty-exhibition-tickets-17761834124?aff=esv [date and time accessed 11/12/2015, 12.26 pm]

Daty, Frederic ‘Trinity’

Click to access Daty_TRINITY_Catalogue.pdf

[date and time accessed: 11/12/2015, 12.47 pm]

Oldfield Ford, Laura. ‘Stanley Picker Fellow Fine Art
http://www.stanleypickergallery.org/fellowships/laura-oldfield-ford/ [date and time accessed: 11/12/2015, 10.41 am]

Oldfield Ford, Laura. ‘The street is always the most important place’ http://www.tate.org.uk/context-comment/articles/laura-oldfield-ford-street-most-important-place [date and time accessed: 11/12/2015, 11.13 am]

Searle, Adrian (2012), Post-atrocity exhibition: Jane and Louise Wilson’s disturbing films. The Guardian 22 October 2012.

Wilson, Jane and Wilson, Louise (2013), Photographing the ruins of the future. El Pais 14 July 2013.

My Metal Work Development

P1010924P1010922P1010921P1010919

Metal Workshop Developments 

I currently attend metal workshops during my time at university where I have learnt many different techniques so far, such as cutting shapes from metal and welding the shapes together to produce models. I have learnt the safety procedures that are needed to carry out metal work, as it can be very dangerous, this is because you could injure your body seriously when carrying out metal work. The images above show myself operating some of the machinery which I have learnt, for example the saw to cut metal, the welding equipment to piece the metal together and shaping equipment to change the form of the different pieces. Currently I have used metal rods to make a tower, to which I am wielding these together and this will form the main part of the tower.  This will be an abstract building design, which is almost fantasy. I have also found a small metal head that I have cleaned up and I aim to add it to a long metal pole to make a walking stick.

I particularly enjoy the range of different ideas you can produce especially on large scale sculptural work. The long term aim of the work I produce in the metal workshop is to enhance my line drawings work done in the studio to show the variety of techniques I can achieve in my artwork.

False Friends

Picture1 Picture2

Laura Oldfield Ford                                                                    My work: Destroyed

http://lauraoldfieldford.blogspot.co.uk/

In my Presenting and Curating module I was set a task called  ‘Faux Amis’ the assignment was to choose an artist who I would like to present my artwork alongside. I chose Laura Oldfield Ford as her artwork links to my present project, As I have chosen to produce artworks that have similar themes to her works namely lost history that can never be regained, and neglected and crumbling architecture etc.

The aim of False Friends: 

The idea of this task was to choose a fellow artist that I would like to present my work next to in an art gallery for it to complement my work for the audience.

  • What is my work about?

My work is about catastrophes in destruction of buildings

  • Why have I chose Laura Oldfield Ford?

Her artwork is similar to mine as it’s in black and white and is about buildings which have changed?

  • Why would I like it placed next to my artwork?

Her work relates to my work and makes the audience aware of different styles, media etc, can be used alongside each other to portray similar ideas,

My 5 sentences of Art.

  1. Art is engaged by everyone and can be an escape from the world
  1. Art is a personal statement by the artist
  1. Anything can be art as long as it’s interesting and has a meaning behind it
  1. People struggle to show their art because some people can be offended by it
  1. You can use art as a protest and inspire other people

Learning to love you more

P1010593

Assignment: learningtoloveyoumore.com

In our Art:, Reading, Thinking and writing module we looked at Miranda July’s work and in particularly a project she was involved in entitled ‘learning to love you more’. This project ran from 2002 to 2009, and over 8000 people participated in it.

The website asked the general public to take part ,and create artworks from assignments Miranda July and Harrell Fletcher had created for them.

The public chose one assignment from the lists provided, and completed it following the simple instructions provided for each assignment, Then it was sent in and posted on-line, the aim was to give people an experience of creating their own artworks.

The website:     http://learningtoloveyoumore.com/ 

We were asked to choose one of the assignments listed on the above website i chose

Assignment brief I chose to do:-

  • You may take pictures of the shadows or simply trace them. These solid shapes should then be drawn on paper and coloured in with a single colour.
  • Choose either brown, pink, light green, orange or white. Use only one of these colours.
  • The shadows should appear on the page in a grid formation, in rows. Treat this like an index of shadows rather than a work of abstract art.
  • The finished report should include 10-20 shadows and should be drawn on white paper
  • Do not label this poster in any way, except to write your name and the date on the back. My god these are going to be beautiful.

My Artwork 

  • How I did it: I collected some white paper and I had a look around my environment for shadows to draw. The shadows I chose I found interesting due to the diverse shapes.
  • Why I did it: I chose this assignment because I found the idea therapeutic to draw shapes that are around me. Also I have an interest in drawing therefore I felt it would develop my skills and make me think further about just the shape I am drawing.
  • Why Pink?: I chose pink to colour my shapes in as it is a relaxing colour and I feel that it relates to things I like for example strawberry ice cream
  • What I have learnt?: I learnt a lot doing this assignment as I didn’t realise how shapes can make so many different shadows. Also the idea a shape can change so much depending on the light, for example a moving person.

Catastrophe

Dark Break Deteriorate Closer up view

Catastrophe:

This current project is called Catastrophe started on October 2015 using graphite on A1 card with the use of a ruler to execute straight lines.

Description:

My catastrophe is about how things can change in a lot of different ways because of this I aim to show this in my artwork. The pieces I have drawn are about old castles and buildings that are slowly turning to ruins and unfortunately will never look the same. The pieces above include drawings of old people as I feel they have similarities to the buildings as they are both affected by age and time.

I have chose to show my artwork through line drawings on large A1 pieces of card using only black pencil to make it look like blueprints of architectural drawings. I add darker tones in some of the lines to emphasise shape and the use of a ruler to construct straight and clean lines.

I draw from images of castles that I have visited first hand to experience the ruins for myself to gain the best insight I can instead of just getting information from images found online.

Meaning:

I aim to get a reaction from the public as I feel old buildings need to be taken care of more as we are losing history. Therefore I want to portray an emotional plea to help conserve these deteriorating buildings. Personally making these pieces bring me happiness as I have a keen interest in English Heritage however it does make me sad that with no care these buildings will be no more for the next generations.

The Life of Ann Hamilton

I recently completed a 2,000 word essay for my art degree on the artist Ann Hamilton. I had personally never heard of Hamilton until I started researching her for my work, however, I really enjoyed learning about her artwork and the different themes she uses.

annhamilton1

“As representations of history, the connection between photography and memory is undeniable. The artist Ann Hamilton explores this relationship with a particular emphasis on human senses and cultural history. She examines tactile experience through visual images and stimulates memories in the viewer, either rooted in the body or in the subconscious. Her images are also impregnated with cultural symbols and memories and therefore can act as sites of memory. In many ways, Hamilton’s images refer to both the individual and the social, as well as the relationship between them. In addition, the manner in which one develops memories based on cultural factors plays a significant role in Hamilton’s art practice.” (Melisa Discepola 2015)

Introduction

annhamilton2
This essay will focus on the work of Ann Hamilton dealing with her development from small projects to larger ones and the way her work has changed over the years. I have chosen this artist because I intend to use her work to influence my own, in particular the way in which her personality shines through that work, and the way she uses everyday themes.
I contacted Ann via email and she sent across a number of documents to assist me with my research. This was extremely helpful and the sources I have used are included in my bibliography and reference list.
Chapter 1 – Personal Life and Inspiration (original context)

Ann Hamilton was born in Lima, Ohio in 1956. She studied Geology and Literature at St. Lawrence University, in Canton, New York but later received a BFA in textile design in 1979, and an MFA in sculpture in 1985. She is currently an Arts and Humanities distinguished professor at The Ohio State University. Ann is married to the installation artist Michael Mercil, who also teaches at Ohio University. She has one son.
Hamilton began her career as an artist with sculpture, but has now moved on to textiles. However, “Hamilton prefers to be called a ‘maker’ rather than an artist.” (Krista Tippett 2014) She is also interested in the spoken word, and uses sound in the form of voices in most of her installation artwork. She likes people to become involved in her art. She uses fabric, dark inks and other textiles on her work as well as speakers and cameras for the voices and other noises. These she uses in unusual ways, for example, setting charcoal up as wind chimes on the ceiling designed to make noise when people touch them. According to Hamilton she often gains inspiration while walking her dog, this is from the landscape, weather and light. She says “If you live somewhere that has a lot of space and sky in it, I think your sense of place grows to meet that.”
This is something which particularly resonates with me since I too get inspiration when I am walking. An example of this is my work, 101 drawings where I looked around and saw inspiration in the different signs I saw, for example, everyday signs on billboards, road signs and toilet doors. I made a collage out of all the symbols and this was an everyday theme which everybody could relate to in some way, similar to Hamilton’s work.

Chapter 2 – My Favourite Artworks (formal analysis)

The Common SENSE Series

annhamilton3
One of Ann’s artworks is ‘The Common SENSE series.’ Presently exhibited in the Henry Art Gallery, Seattle, Washington, October 11th, 2014 – April 26th, 2015. The inspiration for this series, according to Hamilton came from collections in the Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, and the University of Washington collections where she saw clothes made from fur. This led to her developing a theory about why we wear silk clothes and fabrics; not just to cover ourselves and keep us warm at night, but also to make us more sociable when we go outside to meet other people, and to improve our appearance. When we touch the fabric, it’s soft to the touch. Hamilton says “When I first started making things out of cloth, it was like it was another skin. So I was thinking about it as an animate surface, and thinking about it as something that both covers and reveals.” (Krista Tippett, 2014)
Ellie Dicola mentions several socio-economic issues which Hamilton’s Common SENSE series reminds her of, such as “the apocalypse, a biological epidemic’s sense of volume, a belief held by some Native Americans that the act of photographing could steal the subject’s soul” and “the BP oil spill” (2014)
The animal furs brought about the theme of death, but while Hamilton was in the Henry museum, she also saw dinosaur bones, which gave her a similar theme of extinction. ‘The Common SENSE series’ photo’s included in this are taken from The Henry Art Gallery’s brochures. The exhibition shows animals who are sewn and cut up in half. This isn’t the first time Hamilton has used animal parts in her work however. In 1989, her ‘taxonomy and communion’ artwork portrayed 14,000 human and animal teeth. Hamilton said “the animal and human, split previously by an expanse of space, are here laid side by side: omnivore by omnivore, herbivore by carnivore.”
The Common SENSE series has pictures which she took of animals – birds and frogs among others – and hung on the walls of the museum. People were encouraged to take pictures of the animals and read poems to them. They were also asked to put their ideas and reactions down on paper which were then also stuck up on the wall, thus becoming part of the artwork.

annhamilton4
At her exhibition, even the words spoken to the animals were a form of touch, almost like a comfort blanket surrounding the animals. Most museums do not allow people to touch the exhibits, visitors are required to ‘touch’ only with their eyes and ears, but Hamilton encourages people to touch her work. Patricia C. Phillips (1999) says “Hamilton’s art advocates that thinking be purposeful yet indirect. We are challenged to actually or imaginatively move, touch, listen, smell, hear, and taste. Certainly sight remains significant, but it is not always the most privileged or reliable physical sense in an appreciation of Hamilton’s dimensional and discursive work.”
The message behind Hamilton’s artwork is that nothing lasts forever. It’s a life lesson to both children and adults. As regards to my own work, I am particularly interested in how she presented it, using the photographs of actual animals rather than just representations. I took photographs of dead birds on the road that I came across, and used these pictures for inspiration whilst doing my work ‘The end of a Song’. I found this hard to do, being forced to consider the animal’s loss of life. I recreated my own series of work, using mainly ink, again influenced by Hamilton who uses ink constantly in her work.
The Event of a Thread

annhamilton5
Hamilton’s latest installation art, and my personal favourite, is ‘The Event of a Thread.’ Commissioned by Park Avenue Armory, New York, December 5th 2012 – January 6, 2013. It is a huge cloth which stretches across the room in the middle so it cuts in half. The audience swing on the swings which hang down from the ceiling. When they swing, the cloth moves into different shapes. It is a very interactive piece since the swings depend upon the audience who sit on them, and in this way keep them going. This causes a feeling of dependence for the onlookers, and an emotional connection with the piece. Hamilton likes people to talk during the exhibition, with microphones so that everyone can hear them. The installation has a sense of eunoia, one of beautiful thinking and the feeling that Hamilton has the audience’s interests at heart.
She discovered this need for an audience after her 1984 artwork ‘a bird in the hand’, in which she sat on a perch for up to 3 hours, sometimes without an audience. She found herself sitting alone, feeing stranded, and this is when she decided her artwork needed to be social. She explained “in recognizing my stranded predicament on the wall behind a closed door I came to understand that the pieces needed to be social rather than something you go off and do by yourself.” (Joan Simon 2002)
Birds are also part of the event of a thread. This artwork is all about childhood memories; the birds remind her of when her grandmother read to her and there were birds outside the window, and the swing from being on swings as a child. She describes the feeling by saying “we were sailing, so inside the motion – time stopped – and then suddenly rushed again toward us.” She used carrying pigeons because they are trained to stand still. People sat on a table reading out poems into a microphone sitting with the birds in cages. This represented freedom of speech and a juxtaposition to people swinging freely and birds stuck in cages. I contacted Ann Hamilton to ask her about the title of ‘The Event of a Thread’, she sent me information that explained that she had read a book called ‘On Designing’ by Anni Alber. In the book, there was a sentence which said ‘all weaving is the event of a thread’, and this is where she got her idea for the project.
Included in the essay is a sketch of her idea for her work which shows how she set it up. It was the biggest artwork she had done in the previous decade. The red part of the sketch is the cloth; the main part of the work. The people at the back are the ones who read out the poems and strong words with the birds around them. The lines with the fleck of paint make the shape of the swings.
Chapter 3 – Early Work and Most Recent Work (contemporary context)

annhamilton7
Hamilton’s first piece of work was ‘The Body Object Series’ in 1984, where she made a suit and stuck toothpicks to it. The exhibition was a full series of black and white photographs were body parts were being changed for every day mundane objects instead, and so making them an extension of the body. It explored what we would look like if certain body parts were different. In another photograph, she had half a shoe attached to her face, which made it look like she had a shoe in her mouth. Patricia C Phillips says “whether in matters of temporality, scale or meaning, paradoxical tensions contribute to the structure of Hamilton’s work. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the body object series. ” (p122)
Hamilton’s work is open to interpretation, and the body object series to me, could also symbolise asomatognosia, often known as Phantom Limb – when someone who has lost a limb can still feel it on their body.
Hamilton’s work was included in a collection put together by Madeleine Schwartzman, which showed other artists who have also done similar work with body parts. Her work was viewed as humorous in some areas by the audience. Madeleine Schwartzman says, “The viewer is left to wonder about the implication. Should the image be taken at face value—as humorous, surreal or disturbing—or should we read into it questions about embodiment and sensation, and attempt to reason out the body’s new functionality? It is almost impossible to avoid the latter.” (See yourself sensing, 2014)
Looking at the collection makes the viewer wonder if the body has grown an object, or the object has grown a body. Depending where the object was on the body, it had deeper meaning to it, like the shoe which was cut in half, which symbolised the world stopping her talking because it was blocking her ability to speak.
She also had a piece of work titled, Alepha video/sound, exhibited 1992-1993, at the List Visual Arts Centre, Massachusetts. This is a video of Hamilton’s mouth with stones rolling together inside it, and a sound video of the noise this makes. It was seen at the end of a very long room. Hamilton notes, “I remember cutting into the wall to fit the small round-backed standard television” When four more related “overflow” videos were added to the exhibition in 1993, Hamilton requested they use flat-screen monitors instead to get around this happening again.

annhamilton8

Hamilton likes her work to be striking, to engage the viewer’s strongly and to encourage that viewer to have a better understanding of the world. Her works aren’t too different, she still keeps the main topic, trying to cause feeling but the first one was on a much smaller scale. Now, she does bigger installation art to affect everyone. It’s not necessarily the size of the work that is more effective, but the involvement from the audience. Hamilton’s latest work is about exploring childhood memories, so she is almost going backwards in her work. Now, at the pinnacle of her life and career, as she grows older, she can think about her past fondly.
Hamilton’s has two collaborative works of art on show this year. One is called ‘Toward Textiles’, January 18th – September 27, 2015. The exhibition ‘Draw’ is one of six toward textiles exhibitions focusing on the materials and processes comprising contemporary fiber art. In this video presented from four spinning projectors, Hamilton shoots it from above with a miniature, surveillance camera, it follows a red thread traveling over and under a piece of semi-transparent, white paper. The sound track is of the thread been pulled through the paper.
The other titled ‘White,’ exhibited on January 24 – April 26, 2015, at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Jacksonville. It is a collaborative artist’s exhibition, of iconic works of art in many diverse media, the common factor is that they all use this colour white as inspiration. Hamilton’s Installation Still Life, 1988/1991, White Shirts, is featured in this exhibition. As I mentioned before about Ann going backwards in her art due to the childhood theme in the event of a thread, she is now going back to her roots of textiles, where she started out.
Hamilton also has a performance art coming up with Ann Bogar, titled The Theater is a Blank Page, from April 23rd – April 26th, 2015, a performance collaboration with SITI Company, Wexner Center for the Arts, Columbus. The theatre is a blank page metaphorically refers to both the solitary and the immersive, sensory yet imaginative experience of reading. I am interested and looking forward to seeing her new works, and I am sure that many others will be as well.
Conclusion

Overall, I have enjoyed looking at Hamilton’s work as it resonates with me. I named my own work series ‘The end of a song’, which took its inspiration from Hamilton’s work. In particular, her themes on death which she portrays in the Common SENSE series.
The techniques I used similar to Hamilton’s are the use of inks and layers which she uses a lot in her work, putting things on top of each other so that it’s almost never ending, a technique I adopted. I painted on top of things, and placed more material on top to make my final piece. I also used real bird feathers with my artwork, as Hamilton took her inspiration from real animal parts.

annhamilton9
Hamilton uses large installations for her work, and she always uses a theme, such as death, extinction, childhood and in the body object series, the theme of body parts which have been replaced. Hamilton’s work often unconsciously reminds people of themes which she didn’t set out to portray. Joan Simon explains this when talking about the ‘between taxonomy and communion’ exhibition in 1989. She says “The images of masses of extracted teeth, as well as shearings, reminded many visitors of the Holocaust, although, again, this was not Hamilton’s conscious intention.” Hamilton’s Common SENSE series for me, portrayed the idea of asomatognosia (or Phantom Limb), though this was not her intention either.
Hamilton uses these themes to relate to everybody on some level, believing that everyone can relate to it. Although she has changed her themes over the years, presenting them through bigger and better installations she has kept the emotional connection through these themes with the viewer.
She inspires other people with her work and because everybody can take something from it, they are more likely to be interested in her work in the future.